Herpes Zoster Avoid Food

THING! Caviars of Shit! Who are the caviar and what is their ideology?? An innocent question


Caviars shit!

Who are the caviar and what is their ideology?? Yesterday

facebook read by someone shot at another "caviar of shit!" Just because your partner reminded him that Fujimori was involved with large-scale corruption. This prompted my reflection on who the caviar and what his ideology.

Just type "caviar" in google to introduce the origins of the term "caviar" in France. It is not my intention to repeat that. What is rather mean to say in how to conceptualize this is now called an adjective.

adjetiviza generally as "caviar" liberals in Peru: supporters of FTAs, investment, human rights and the market. These critics of traditional political parties, but they are political opponents of the Fujimori and APRA leadership and less on the radical left. A Peruvian liberals gave them the nickname of "caviar" especially because their liberalism is associated with the defense of human rights as it really is common among liberals about the world. Major

Liberal del Peru ("accused" of caviar), we have to Javier Perez de Cuellar (former UN Secretary General), Valentin Paniagua (Ex President of Peru), Diego Garcia Sayan (current president of the IACHR) Susana Villaran (Former Minister), Rosa Maria Palacios (the most influential TV journalist), Augusto Alvarez Rodrich (the most influential print journalism), Francisco Soberon (APRODEH President and one of the top 50 human rights defenders in the world ), Beatriz Merino (1 st woman Premier democracy in Peru and current Ombudsman), César San Martín (Judge to sentence Fujimori, and the only member of the Peruvian judiciary included among the 100 most influential Latin American characters, 2009), Julio Cotler (the most prestigious social scientists in Peru), Gustavo Mohme million (missing journalist and owner of one of the most prestigious newspapers Peru, The Republic), Gustavo Gutierrez (Priest, intellectual liberation theology and the Prince of Asturias Prize), Luis Bambaren (Former President of the Peruvian Episcopal Conference, one of the most influential Catholics today), Marco Arana ( principal ecologist and the most recognized international environmentalists of Peru today), Fernando Rospigliosi (Ex Minister of Interior and designated as agent of the Department of State USA), Marcial Rubio Correa (President of the PUCP, the most prestigious University of Peru), etc. To be objective, the three priests mentioned (Gutierrez, Bambaren and Arana) would converge not necessarily in liberalism but have been further qualified as "caviar" because of its anti-corruption record in defense of democratic institutions and especially because they make common force liberals in their fight against Fujimori. Many

"accused" as caviar, not all belong to the same organization, or even agree on various points of view on the development of country or read the national socio-economic reality, but are united mainly by the defense of liberal democracy, the market as the primary allocator of resources in society, human rights and political liberalism. As well as its fight against corruption, the vices of traditional politics and political extremism. Its main enemies are the politicians Fujimori and his allies. Another feature of the so-called "Caviars is that they are usually men and women of state, who are not involved in corruption and experienced administrative and governance. They are the liberal elite of state. They are different from the leftists in both are liberal by conviction, openly defend representative democracy and markets, and are different from the neo-liberals argue about the effectiveness of the state to take better advantage of international market, human rights and fighting corruption. Not correspond with the nationalists whose leader (Ollanta Humala) seen as a demagogue and statist.

What alienates viscerally of Fujimori, his intellectual and moral authority. No "caviar" was involved in corruption or violation of human rights while almost nonexistent in the Fujimori (and among its allies, as the current leadership APRA) someone who is not involved in corruption and / or human rights violations.

is therefore neither politics nor economics especially distinguishes the caviar of Fujimori and allies but corruption and violations of human rights. From there comes the visceral hatred of Fujimori to callers caviar, because they know they are, and feel less morally and intellectually and that provokes a deep hatred because they too would like to have some attributes of the liberal state they call " caviar "with disdain. The Fujimori is deeply despised by liberals and leftists despise time. The leftists despise Fujimori, but envy the "caviar" and try to hide their inferiority complex to the Liberals (or caviar) with a mock contempt. Just give a read to the files to realize that the Fujimori rank among the most deceitful and cynical political history of Peru, but the hatred of Fujimori to the liberal (or caviar) is sincere, is perhaps the most sincere they have. The most lumpenesca while political action is that which has been led Fujimori to the Peruvian liberals (caviar).

The Fujimori and his allies can not appear before their constituents as morally and intellectually inferior to their rivals, the Liberals or caviar, and to feel morally and intellectually inferior you is very hard, so they can not lose battles without appearances before the public. And can not rise higher than liberals try to reduce them, at least to people, try to remove it from morality to the citizenry. They accuse them of "caviar" that is drawing up proposals against poverty while having a comfortable life style. But they do not really serious, but as an insult, exaggerating the alleged wealth of the "caviar" and distorting the meaning when they are not proposals of the Liberals. For example, today the Commission has raised the Peruvian State to cover the costs of trials without due process, but the dome APRA and have fujimontesinistas this as "compensation" for terrorists, and of course, as if the Liberals were not in favor of the rule of law, but being "generous" with terrorists, if not accusing them of pro-terrorist. They want to distort reality, to present white as black as black and white born from a deep inferiority complex moral and intellectual development of Fujimori and his allies felt against the Liberals. It would be good to get a newspaper to say the files of a newspaper like The Commerce during an election year and count how many times the Fujimori and his allies have said to defend the poor and how assets and income received and compare them with the Liberals. It would be unusual for Fujimori to win in two areas: they have more properties and also are sold more as advocates for the poor.

In fact, both liberals (caviar) and the Fujimori and allies are political elites. And none of these two sides are a united group and are part of a joint organization and do not necessarily have personal ties or between or within each side. And only share general views, and stuff.

What unites the "anticaviares" are not political, but dislike the Liberals (to callers with disdain "caviar"). This is the reason that its definition of caviar is not political, but in tone and made adjectival qualifier.

The difference between a liberal and a liberal agenda, the same as that between a "caviar" and Fujimori. All or almost all follow the same coordinates neoliberal policies that Fujimori general, while all or nearly all liberals Peruvians are related to so-called "caviar."

A liberal (or "caviar") will always be liberal in political terms, a supporter of liberal democracy, fundamental market as allocator of resources, and defense of human rights. That is very similar to U.S. liberal. In fact, in Peru as "caviar" in the United States are liberal. Instead, neoliberals are extremists in favor of absolute market and crush all of the rights of workers and the consecration of transnational capital unambiguously even above human rights. Fujimori is the most extreme expression.

The neoliberals are a tiny minority overvalued by their resources (most from the state who say fighting) that make them powerful media attention. Liberals (or caviar) are also a minority, although they may envision the germ of what would be the first liberal party of the country. The Fujimori would see its political decline after the 2011 elections, however, Liberalism in Peru struggle to start new political and electoral viability. Greetings



Edson Baldeón

All ideas in this blog may be reproduced freely only specify its authorship. All Rights Reserved

Brazilian Stomach Flu

Beatriz Ontaneda question "Why when a woman comes to light call it by its name, however if a man is called by his surname? Ejm: In a panel of electoral propaganda to tell Lourdes Flores Nano, Lourdes, and Maria Jesus Enrique candidate Ocrospoma tell: Ocrospoma ... "question is

serve to leave a little to enter politics and other topics. My dear Beatriz, some time ago I asked myself not being equal to the formulas you have any similarity. I wondered why some call them by name while others by their last name? As you can see not introduced the factor of gender and sex. But as I answered the question this way: People have a tendency to save what I can in different areas, but also follows certain criteria in order to save words, prefer what works best for a better identification, and thus prefers least common use of their 1 st or last names. Regarding the former, actually people tend to save words, for example to the Catholic University says "The cato" dad "pa", Catherine (my little neighbor) tells "tasting", etc. So many of the names are not complete but muhos say where the first two syllables, but only the first. Sofi (for Sophia), Al (by Alberto), Robert (Roberto), Giselle (by Gisela), Maga (by Magali), Fede (by Federico), etc., Etc.,

In the second case, the If you described, why sometimes used names or surnames, I answered this way: what it is to better identify the person and save time trying to distinguish one person from another. Should actually called "Alan Garcia, Lourdes Flores, Humberto Lay," Ollanta Humala "Susana Villar, Luis Castaneda, etc, but are usually called up by one of them for reasons of economy of language But why only some Scogan the only the name and other name?

Pongo examples to make it more graphic and understandable: Humberto Lay, Lay usually tell, because it is more common Humberto Lay. is that there are many Humbert and few Lays, one is more common than another. And so, as there are many Garcia'sy few Alan, at least when the President now became famous, then it is easier for the less common call either your name or surname. To identify others. Antero Antero Flores told more and less because there are many Florez Florez that anthers (better to call what we hear that what is read). The same goes for Lourdes Flores, is called "Lourdes" because that is always called and no need to change the name because it would be worth: Flores is just as common to Lourdes. As the two are commonly referred to by the two together: Lourdes Flores. " In the case of Lourdes Alcorta is called "Alcorta" or "Alcorta" it is not to be confused with "Alcorta Lourdes Flores as it is less common than" Lourdes. " In the case of Ollanta Humala, sucede que ambos no son tan comunes, al igual que sucede con Lourdes Flores se le dice “Ollanta” o “Humala”. Aquí sí puede funcionar un solo nombre porque ambos no son tan comunes (aunque ambos sean sustantivos propios). En el caso de Luis Castañeda, se le dice “Mister Comunicore”, jajajajj, nada, se le dice “Castañeda” porque es menos común que “Luis” y más aún que “Lucho”. Con Victor Andres García Belaunde se le llama por sus nombres y apellidos completos porque llamarlo “Víctor García” no tiene Cashe, es muy común, así que con llamarlo “Víctor Andrés García Belaunde” indistinguishable do, but because it is very long and economise is called simply "Vitocho."

question A timely response Ocrospoma call him because his name Enrique is more common. For them when they told the panel Lourdes Flores Lourdes "economized the call" Lourdes Flores "and when they called Enrique Ocrospoma only" Ocrospoma "also economized words because so named because they did not need to call him" Henry Ocrospoma "and only choose the least common, then your last name. They combined the two things, first the economy of language but this economy is using common least as common among their 1 st name and surname. Ever heard humble people who call Lourdes Flores 1, or its name or its 1 st surname but simply "Nano." I do. There you can clearly see the logic of people on the subject.

way one day I did a critique Sasieta Congresswoman Rosario, and when we met I said (in his style) "when referring to me but do not call me Sasieta Charo." Charo But what to call just because you ask me when it's easier to say "the congressman Sasieta" Imagine if you write an article "Congresswoman Charo said ..." No one would understand me! It will not then. One thing is that when you referred to someone in a face to face and quite another when it comes to identify that person publicly (in writing or by any means of communication). There is a logic when it comes to public men and women.

When you're in the family is often referred to by its name because it is illogical that the call Lourdes Flores "Flores" when everyone in the house are flowers. Just how I'm going to call my home Baldeón when several Baldeón. It will not then. When someone calls someone he wants to be responded, but how you will respond if not clearly distinguished. Also the name is always "loving" the name, because it is chosen especially for you. Instead, upon arrival at school, you "change" the name and call you by your name. The reason is because there is much less likely to have more unusual names than names. For example, it is likely that fewer Carlos Lopez, but especially because you change it officially in the records of attendance and all school records first and then put their names names. For example, many college friends did not know my name, they told me Baldeón, but at home I said "Ed" Edson. And I guess, Beatriz estimated that once you have called you "Bea", right?

When public figures postulate prefer to be called by their names rather than by their surnames, Lourdes Flores Lourdes prefer to be told, Luis Castaneda prefers even tell you "fight", and not even Luis, etc, but more Marketers as a form closer to the population. Have not seen the Kuchinsqui who prefers to be told "Pedro Pablo" or even PPK? The marketing also has a say in these matters.

For Keiko Fujimori Alberto Fujimori and the first case that we simply say Fujimori for economy of language, from "Albert" and "Fujimori" · choose only one: the less common, in this case "Fujimori" ('at least it was less common in 1990), while Keiko Keiko also just tell him also to economize words and Keiko Fujimori "choose only one but it happens not to choose "Fujimori" but "Keiko" to distinguish it from the father (who in turn popularized as the "Fujimori"). In the case of singers seems that marketing explains everything really Does anyone know how Madonna called or Shakira? Surely people would be interested, but I do more than their songs ... or hip ... Greetings

Edson Baldeón