How Many Calories In Toothpaste

: 4 QUESTIONS THE VOTE TO DECIDE WHAT TO EXPECT


When I was young to decide my vote was simple: always voted left. A ideological voting, principled, elementary. Come the gray and one is realizing that things are not so simple.

Today, I do 4 basic questions to decide who to vote for: 1. Who has clean hands, 2. Who has done an efficient, 3. Who defends democracy and freedom, 4. Who promotes social justice and a better distribution of opportunities.

The first two questions seem less ideological, until a little political, but end up being very important. Leftists who steal, there are also. Political ineffective and clumsy, are in every store, can be good for election campaigns but unable have good projects and realize them. Sometimes it is better to someone who does not make great changes we want, but to do good things for people, before knowing that Castaneda had tremendous kebab with the Comunicore, I had that impression of him, with initiatives such as stairs, Solidarity hospitals and parks that are good for the people of Lima. The nearly 30 million stolen Lentopolitano Comunicore and costing 300 million over budget, another reality show.

first 2 Along with these basic questions, corruption and efficiency, most policies are: democracy and social justice, which are the broad guidelines that define me understand a modern left. I do not like dictators to concentrate power and impede the freedoms, and government dedicated to supporting the enormous injustice that cross our country.

to assess based on these 4 questions to candidates in an election, you have to hear the speeches but also see their shares, they have actually done. Indeed, the answers are not always so clear, but these questions to me are for weighing alternatives. Let

a quick review of the candidates for Lima. Let's start with you might be out of the race, Alex Kouri. Corruption: With a toll that we stole tens of millions of soles for his family firm, not hands are clean but quite dirty. Efficiency: Some think it has good management, but do not know that the Callao has a budget similar to Lima with an eighth of population, which has much more money or do not know that between 2007 and 2009 the government Callao regional left Kouri chaired by running 200 million soles of your budget, 200 million in his account that did not use for his province. Democracy: If Kouri in the parlor of the INS negotiated settlement with Montesinos was not enough sample of its bureaus, the jump in this election from one party to another are no internal election to complete the shape. Social Justice: PPP leader, an ally of Fujimori and Alan Garcia has always been on the side of the rich. With 0 to 4, 4 answers wrong in any way vote for him.

On with Lourdes Flores. Corruption: the person has to defend an accused drug dealer and collect a million suns to defend the entry of used cars that pollute the city, but still can not be accused of stealing. Efficiency: they have no experience of governance, so we can not qualify it as inefficient, even if inexperienced. Democracy: was in the fight against dictatorship, crushing at times, but was, to his credit. Social justice: the right PPC is recalcitrant, the strongest advocates of neoliberalism, they do not want a better distribution of wealth. In short, Lourdes has 1 answer for, 2 against, 1 half, neither has my preference. Susana Villaran

. Corruption: completely clean, nobody can get any charges of wrongdoing or links to drug traffickers or thieves. Efficiency: former minister of women and implemented a budget of 300 million soles, and did well at a difficult time, shortly after the fall of Fujimori when he had to clean up and rebuild the institutions. Democracy: the wad in the fight against the dictatorship, leading the Coordinator of Human Rights when burned potatoes and the risks were great, only that it is highly commendable. Social Justice in favor of redistribution and social rights activist in a social and Christian left that led her to live in the Rimac and found the first experience of a glass of milk helps families affected by the crisis. Susana add 4 good answers, my preferences are clear.

Humberto Lay. Corruption: looks clean, and religion helps. Efficiency: no management experience, his party has not fared very well or with members of Congress (anyone remember who they were or know where they are?) Or its candidates (few weeks before the registration of another candidate lists submitted by his party, he went to another store policy). Democracy: I do not know who has or thinks about it, but that have a social base of his parishioners did not sound right. Social Justice: top advisor to PPK is clear that kicks to the side of the powerful. Although I have doubts about some answers, Lay not pass the fence.

could go with others, but I think that's enough for now. As always, there is no ideal candidate. Life is like that: nothing is perfect. But we now have a very good candidate, a very good list, and we must seize the opportunity to vote with gusto, with enthusiasm, with hope. Not for the lesser evil but good may come. I will mark the boxes with the FS in these elections in Lima.

крэк на Vocal Remover

SUSANA IN THE DEBATE?? THE LIE OF ALDO


In July, Susana Villaran was 4% according to PUCP. Actually ranges from 3 to 5%, according to several polls. And he had a support several times the level A / B socio-economic level D / E. For example, while in July gave 1% at level D / E. Now in August in the same sector D / E has risen to 6%, or had sextúpliocado their level of acceptance according to the survey PUCP lower levels of Lima.

Lay in July had an 8% acceptance level D / E shows a rise and reached 12%, or an increase of 50%. Humberto Lay has been promoted in 2006 as presidential candidate and then as a municipal candidate in social media. Susana Villar has been less publicized in the mainstream media. So if at first this season Lay enjoyed municipal preference among the popular classes is likely to be because they know more, not to enjoy more sympathy Susana net. This can be seen on the results of surveys of the past two months. In the last month as Susan grew by 600% at level D / E Humberto Lay grew 50% over the same period of time from the same socioeconomic level. BECAUSE THAT IS A MYTH THAT SUSANA have limited potential in this sector. And the truth is rather that while they know the are accepted. Eye only in the last days Susana is being promoted in the areas of mass communication. The results of this may just be the next survey in September. The trend is apparently a growth.

In my opinion, should be directed to Susan Villarán every effort at the grassroots, and must do so by changing his address at the bottom and form. If you want to go to the poor and make the poor must show firmness, strength in his words, the things he says. The poor, even by a long family tradition, give in to the poses of force decision. The nuances are no preference in this sector show as a reflexive or intellectual doubt not seem to be very productive if it votes to make sure in these sectors. In addition to force the image of expertise is another quality that they value the poor, which should show that has figures, figures verbally expressing that although the poor do not understand clearly do understand that it dominates the subject, which has been prepared and that there is someone who met him at the nomination. The power of force and the preparation does not require any pose Susan theoretical thinking in the debate today. One important thing: to make public mention of his resume: he was Minister of State, who was Police Ombudsman, an official of the Ministry of Interior and also is an expert on Public Safety. Poor people love successful people. If he says no candidates who have no experience in government as she has directed the State to Valentin Paniagua, will certainly be very enlightening for the poor of their capacity. Something highly valued among these sectors. That

Susana also note that the poor always hope to gain little something, if you can technically support the bonus of 100 soles for each family will undoubtedly have an impact among the working class, but if only the states and not technically supported reactionary media's going to mash, they're going to ridicule and will lose credit with popular sectors.

Now that both Kouri and Lourdes have been weakened by questions that compromise their ethics Susana public should make it clear, and express verbally that she is a person whose record of honesty has never been discussed in contrast to what happens with Kouri and Lourdes.

is not true that the poor do not like honesty. Everyone will always be in favor of honesty. Of course, as you wonder if you agree with them steal even though they obviously works then coerce their freedom of choice, and only then conjure up statements like that are agreed to steal but they do work. This does not apply if at the same Time does not raise the possibility of being together for work to be done without stealing.

Strength, Solidarity, experience, technical efficiency and incorruptibility must transmit to the poorer classes to which they must appeal to win this election. .

In short, Susan is trying to get a teflon containing media attacks on his opponents to liberalism, because right now she has become the representative of liberalism and must be expected to be a victim in the coming weeks especially tending account of the popular sector which has to win at all costs. If Susan get to go up between the popular sector will definitely Lay out of the race. Just may try to form a new polarization with Lourdes Flores Nano, leaving Alex Kouri definitely excluded. If Sue accomplished that feat then a growing sector of middle-class voters meditate leave Lourdes and support the candidacy of Villarán. And the nomination of Susan can help you be a real option for Lima municipal government. Greetings

Edson Baldeón

Telephone Line Transferletter

M.


Today newspaper front page Mail has published the following headline: "Susan do not be pine needles, the Popular Action Slams. What do you mean daily? Jaime Bayly last Sunday, account for a debate This week sponsored by the newspaper El Comercio, said that Joy Gonzalo has not been invited, so ask your interviewee, Susana Villaran whether to invite Gonzalo.

"You would ask to include Gonzalo Joy in the debate?" Asked the reporter to Villa, to which she replied: "Yes .. He wanted to go with us (in the campaign), that is to imagine ".

Where is the alleged lie? Edmundo E Eagle interview. He reportedly said: "It was she, Villar, who approached because we had no closer why.


Aldo M. distorts things. And create your own news to your taste, and as judge and jury and without any inquiry even minimal research evaluates, judges and sentencing. Susan did not interview, did not ask her point of view, not asked to clarify the meaning of his expression when it is obvious that the response of Villa can be equated to the following:

"Yes, I would like to participate in the debate Joy because we have excellent relations. " But he pulls the news over the side without much foundation. And this is bad for journalism.

Aldo M. Lies is that Susan Joy said never approached her or that she went to Alegria go together in this campaign. Or even address the issue. Susana said only that "He wanted to go with us all. If someone wanted to know who called whom they could ask and I do not Villarán Susana Gonzalo Joy or have reason to lie. Who misrepresents things by Montesinos style, Aldo M. distorts things, acopmoda to defame a candidate. Should be reported both in the journalistic profession as a criminal.

The truth of the story is this: at the beginning when Joy arrived in Peru, (eye who lived in Spain until recently, so as Kouri continuity of residence would not in Lima, but no one has crossed), and probably realized that his options were low was pre-arrangement with Susan for a joint bid (who contacted who do not know) and agreed to endorse Susan, well , within the Popular Action party that has joined recently and was recommended Joy JAO and the sole candidate. AP militancy ve'ñia not this well and never knew if the President or Vice President were aware or authorized these conversations. When the alliance was almost a given, Congressman Yohny Lescano, Secretary General of PA, went to half and disavowed JOY PUBLIC GONZALO, told the AP will not ally with anyone and that the lamp WOULD SOLA and in any case, neither the Secretary General as neither party had been authorized to Joy to any alliance, it was so the alliance with Susana Villaran collapsed. This news came out in the media and was public. Eagle now says that the alliance fell apart by about Villa with MNI. In any case this is just made public.

is not accurate nor what Joy said, I do not lie, maybe he was misinformed, as I understand that the Social Force talks with the NMI and the Father Arana come from behind. But beware that if you read carefully at any time or Joy or deny Edmundo Del Aguila Susana Villaran, simply refer another topic that Susan had not discussed. Aldo M. use the words of the leader and candidate AP to twist things and defame a candidate. And that is the manipulation of this pseudo-journalist who should be remembered often said that AP was gone and wrote both FBT pests as Valentín Paniagua. How many times have angered militants sent explanatory letters to this piedrodista? (Yes, piedrodista). Both Joy, Eagle and Susan have been victims of this gentleman.

is not possible for a national newspaper in the hands of a character clearly unbalanced, extreme, McCarthy and a liar and manipulator. Journalism must be left in the hands of journalists rather than the unbalanced. Its sad role of editor of the daily mail has reached the point that the email has the merit of publishing the most racist article of the world, fueling the state terrorism against the indigenous population, as the English "Survival." Just read your pages to realize that this is not a serious newspaper but to a lampoon chicha.

Aldo M. Fear Villarán's bid to have no basis in reality. Progressivism so afraid he's doing a dirty war against Susan for more than a week, what a coincidence, just as Susan begins to grow strongly. Can not say not pulled or 0.5%?? Do not say that the Popular Action party was a non-existent? How it must hurt to Aldo M. see the growing popularity of Dona Susana. Poor have to endure, because Susan is growing and so do not think patelee stops. We see that Fujimori still missing. Greetings. Edson Baldeón.

Husbands With Earrings

Susana, Kouri, Lourdes, Lay, the campaign .... PUTI-SURVEYS


If any good can be drawn from the exclusion of Kouri of the campaign is that the dirty war is not going to be as much as if Kouri, will surely be hard, dirty and all, but Kouri would be worse.
The second is that this exclusion of polarization just Kouri Lourdes-Kouri: if there is no greater evil Why there should be a lesser evil?
In 3 rd place, increase swing votes in the coming days. Surely the undecided leaving the herd of Kouri will follow a couple of weeks, but it's hard to be where Lourdes in high proportion for the simple reason that most of the voters of Lourdes were adhered to contain Kouri, but now that Kouri is a lot of people may ask "Now why I'm voting for Lourdes?? Obviously and without detracting from Lourdes will have to rethink his campaign speech for decency vs. corruption seems exhausted both in Cataño (which is a reality) as output Kouri. What favor is she known Lourdes, and the people who voted for Kouri comes mainly from marginal areas, leaving some points Kouri go directly among the best known and there that something chape Lourdes, but I do not think many.
In 4 th place, the exclusion of Kouri could boost the candidacy of the other candidates, especially that of Susana Villar is already rising in the polls in recent days, following the scandal of Lourdes has received money from (a) Cataño a few weeks ago. In reality it is likely that the votes of Kouri allocated among all candidates, especially between Susan and Lay. Care with Lay now has more people coming from the popular sectors are finally defined the election, he could be the one favored by Fujimori and APRA.
In 5 th place, all candidates need to urgently rethink their campaigns to get votes of Kouri, and Lourdes will eventually lose. While the latter needs to rethink its campaign to keep the winnings., As it has very little room to convince the undecided.
In 6 º a more open setting, without the polarization Kouri vs Lourdes invited to delimit the central theme of the remainder of the season. Chance he will have the strength to define the axis campaign, as the former decency axis vs corruption has been almost exhausted, and in any case hereafter could be used against itself Lourdes (Chestnut weighs and weigh). The only ones that have the power to impose a new main theme at the moment are Susana Villaran and Lourdes Flores, especially the first one coming from behind, hard and find Lourdes without speaking of the greater evil (for Kouri) with which contained the other candidates. Kouri The exclusion can mean a pyrrhic victory for Lourdes Flores to have raised his campaign taking into account only Kouri as criticized weeks ago. Now, Lourdes has the challenge of accommodating the new electoral landscape. If you can do to win, and deserve to win it would have beaten Kouri and Susan, but if it fails to give a reading according to the electoral reality which makes moving your chips erratically lost and would be equally well-deserved defeat. I think at this moment Lourdes continues to have the upper hand and if you win or lose will be your responsibility. His voting record leaves room for doubt.
in 7 th place, it is important that both APRA would like Fujimori, because without Kouri they run out of candidates, and I do not abstain. What you can do is strengthen Lay, I think the latter would have more chance. Have against Lay time. If Susan does a certain polarization to Lourdes then there could be consolidated Lay.
At this point in the Campaign Command of Aunt Susy must be two certainties: 1 being the best moment so far in the campaign, and 2 with the imperative to go hunting for votes sectors. Susana
Villarán In my opinion still has a greater potential in the middle classes which will come to surface when they see a Social Force begins to grow in the popular sectors.
Getting to the grassroots? Here Sue is a twofold task: to reach and also convince to vote for her. Maybe a double play will be productive: Zoom
1, Lourdes people through the dissemination of conservative pro-rich vs cucufato popular sentiment and people's defense.
2 ° Approach people with a strategy of entertainment and education. Another measure to win over youth and working classes would stick to a strategy of entertainment. Its media presentations should be aimed at these people who are looking for entertainment policy. The poor work as a policy can not be seen but as an outlet for their everyday problems. Their own physical bodies asked to make their daily eutoexpandir their sensibilities affected by their work in a context of poverty, and this is achieved through entertainment. Not necessarily appeal to the reason why the reasoning is a bit tiring, physically tired to note that they are tired, your daily life is very tiring to come give me more chamba someone making me think. Therefore, he must link his candidacy to the entertainment if you go with some success to the popular. But the people of the popular sectors place their trust in those who make you feel to protect them, who will look after their interests, and has sufficient strength, insight, and street to get there. Confidence among the middle class has to do with honesty, decency, etc. but the trust between the classes has to do, besides this, also the ability of the custodian of such trust is smart enough, cunning and "travel" (clever, "fly") so they can defend their interests. Therefore a work of political teaching is important among the popular classes. But a modern teaching horizontal language. Susan is able to achieve this in better shape than Lay. Susana Lourdes before facing the final battle has to defeat Lay in the imagination of the popular sectors. In the survey today of Ýpsos Support is seen that Lay has more acceptance among the popular classes Susana. Furthermore, both the dome and the Fujimori APRA appear closer to Susan Lay.
Remember the doll "shower" of Valentin Paniagua. At no time this discredited Dr. Paniagua. Appealing to entertainment does not necessarily mean losing seriously. People understand very well that the central campaign is to develop a strategy for votes. And it looks good who does not understand this. Attend cutting popular programs does not mean losing seriously. Take advantage of all the spaces can also be a sign that being elected authority will do everything possible to achieve the objectives set, or as synonymous with political decision, courage, bravery and these are seen as virtues by the people below. For the reason that they always expect a change, any change that is significant enough to get them where they are. Do not really think, in reality to embarrass them think, just feel it and not clearly, but it's there you have it as a natural response to its daily toil. How else can appeal to entertainment? The images (and talk about the doll Chaparrón) are vital, what you see, you have to consider that merely to see on the screen must mean voter below some entertainment but that does not mean they will vote for you. They simply will be pleased and you then have to knit another strategy that you were pleased to vote for you. And they only vote for you if you are a winner. People generally below (and also those of medium and above) prefer to vote in reference to the winner, either supporting, or giving the counter. But always revolve reference to the figure of the winner. Sometimes support those listed as winners in their attempt to "share" the joy of the winners if only by not know what strange psychological procedure. Sometimes the attack to "share" the battle the pound counterweight which appears as if the candidate winning the counter-power "liaison" with their aspirations and be the hope, anger, jealousy, sacrifice, innovation, or any other feeling that is saved without knowing it, without even establishing why. Thus vote with or against Lourdes Lourdes, which could lead to possible bias or Lourdes to Susan Lay, depending on who I could excel.
Any successful strategy must move away from what people know, you think. Do not try to reinvent the wheel in an election campaign. And people do believe that Lourdes favors the rich, it is falling pituca and avocado and cucufato. Regardless of whether this is true or not this can be used in a campaign strategy. This idea must be crushed to have real effects among the popular classes and the youth. And it has to be until they invade social politics.
If Susan wants to win at Lourdes has to "close" the court. You have to raise the pitch that suits you: liberalism vs civic cucufatería, defending the working class vs. the candidate of the rich. Eye that never goes out of fashion among the popular sectors. With which also contains Lay. Susana
have to close the field polarizing the campaign between her and Lourdes, and thus to contain the third nomination. That people do not be fooled Social Forces, Lourdes is still favorite, I imagine that by now must have a potential of 40% with the addition of the candidacy of Lourdes (despite appearances) is down while Susan is uphill, it also has the pressure of winning and background in the output stage is flat, all of which can be exploited for Susana. Six weeks is more than enough to turn the match Susana. Susan has to take every possible space in the media. His first battle to win is called Humberto Lay, and later they will be with Lourdes. And to win both battles tine to support the popular classes. Can you?

Meagan Good Foto Nuda

opinion studies can be seen as manipulative, opinion formers public or as tools fectivamente reflect the opinion of a timely matter. I will not refer to the nature of the surveys but the comment appeared in the last few hours, the CPI (with some credibility) and the datum (with any credibility, given his background. Generally, I am guided by the results of Support I seem most respectable, or the PUCP.

But despite the unreliability of a survey, for example, of datum, must reflect some truth about any matter, within the range of error. Always is good to note that the nominations progreistas will fall within the error range (2 or 3 points) and related applications over to the media or the economic power it would rise a few points within the error range (2 or 3 points). At least, I read the polls. This with the polls "serious." So you have to take with tweezers numbers.

always useful surveys. Just know how to interpret. Can not read literally IDIC for example when we know that favors the APRA or who want to promote this game. DATUM must also be carefully observed, the same CPI.

Entering the final published results. Both CPI and DATUM are two signals which are of concern to Lourdes as Korui: 1 for the first time has stopped the constant rise of Lourdes since February 2010. and not only his rise has stopped but it has fallen, both the stop and the drop has happened in a matter of days is something of concern to Lourdes. and 2 that a third option (not Lourdes vs Kpouri first appeared) Susana Villaran up between about 80 and 120% of their voting intentions.

For 1 st time this season goes Susana Villaran up. Since the mayor presented the saw between 3 and 4%, but now it has jumped (in both surveys) to more than 8%. What is in short recent data from the last polls published? in my opinion means that for the first time opens the possibility of entry of a third party Susana Villar, and in 2 nd place these facts mean that the counter-campaigns do work.

against what they say Raul Vargas, these counter-campaigns have real effects and fast, so much so that when they launched attacks Kouri fell more than 10 points (some to more than 15 points) and when he attacked Lourdes not only stopped his constant promotion, but for 1 st time also down about 3 points in a few days (and eye we're talking about polls as CPI and DATUM who always Cultural UP generous with Lourdes) and Susan can be interpreted as a reorganization of its potential, I think Susan was relegated because they had no visibility and appeared as a wasted vote, but now that it has received more visibility, people start to see it begin to value and assess it positively. To the extent that if a cross out of race for reasons Kouri domicialiarios who would immediately jump Susana Villaran and that dispute finally be mayor of Lima Lourdes Flores and Susana Villaran thus change the focus of the debate leaving behind what Decency vs corruption by a duo: honesty vs. corruption and left vs. right. And then for the first time since February Lourdes would be likely to fight uphill sto quee risk mean to her.

And this is what is feared as the ranks of PPC. And so Aldo Mariçátegui both attacks. Not a day in which the wayward Director of Mail, Aldo M. not associated with extremism or violence if not with terrorism. What Susan is not sure, could be because it could not happen. Depend on the fate of Kouri, how to leave the trial of Cataño, and the reaction of APRA and I do not think Fujimorismo stay idly, especially depends on what you do or not do Susanna and her command campaign. Let's see how it goes. Carlos Roca at the moment just to show strong resistance to giving up his candidacy by APRA. I copy the video of yesterday, Monday, August 10 responds strongly to the dome and APRA said that his resignation as it is stated would be "impossible" to accept. In this video Carlos Roca also realizes that the APRA CEN spoke of "FAVOERECER A LOW AS Kouri." I also talk about the polls "You know how to handle the polls?" And also noted that the CEN APRA should not be appendix of the Political Committee and that it should not be "appendix" of the Presidency. So, Alan Garcia declared war. Let's see how this ends.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqQO_qKSDRE Greetings. Edson
Baldeón

Hannah Montana Encuera,fotos

SUSANA terrucos?? On McCarthyism in Peru



A the candidate for the Municipality of Lima, Susana Villaran, have jumped "complaints" over alleged links with the violence, extremism and even terrorism. Doña Susana replied that a campaign that is indecent, ignorant and McCarthy. What's behind all this??

all started with a "claim" of a candidate from the PPC, which noted that among the candidates for aldermen of the list would Susana Villaran former MRTA terrorists but never said any names which would constitute a defamation, but apologized Lourdes to Susan and she accepted this apology. However, members of the PPC still repeating the san-benito of terrorism, violence, extremism Susan course without providing any evidence or even reasonable evidence. This newspaper has joined Mail across its front page showed a wolf dressed in sheep's red and white on his chest a sickle and hammer. In Peru, among the common people sickle and hammer means blood, death, destruction, terrorism, namely the campaign against Villa is linked to terrorism to curb its rise especially when the leading candidate Lourdes Flores and Alex Kouri have been seriously questioned. The slogan seems to be tackling Susana arising as a third option now announcing that a new poll by CPI would have risen a few points.

But why try to put Anguie recognized as democratic as Susana Villaran nicknamed terrucos terrucos or pro?? Because until now has been running, though in truth very fairly. Like they did with Toledo when he drew as violent, with the red headband and everything, and end up being a good president or acceptable for most Peruvians. Susana Villaran It has been a good Minister for Women and a good defender of the police. Another victim of this campaign was Ollanta Humala, who in recent years as a pro you want to appear when Ollanta Humala terrorist fought on the ground with terrorists, risking his life. What is known is only presidential candidate who has been part of military emergency in areas where the terror was at its peak.

within a few months ago the same newspaper also pulled Mail on its front page to the terrorist Abimael Guzman and Elena Iparraguirre with Father Arana (who defames calling him "anti-mining" when in fact the father Arana opposed to mining but not some environmental policies of some mining), that is not the first time that this newspaper is paid for these bells. Is also known that the wayward Director of Mail, that Aldo M., has been "rewarded" by the English "Survival" as the world's most racist journalist for an article which is called state terrorism. Other newspapers that always come to this type of bells are Express and Reason, both linked to what is known as the mafia fujimontesinista Coincidence??

But if anyone thinks that this comes with the Shining Path terrorism is wrong, the story is even older. Long before the madness of SL, Victor Raúl Haya de la Torre is also saddled with the same similar accusations from their media called him a terrorist, violent, sectarian, extremist, etc. since insurgió against so-called oligarchic state in the first half of the twentieth century, reviled him as violent, communist agent Soviet, etc. To prove just read the newspapers of the time at the National Library. From there it's SEASAP "Neither Moscow nor with Washintong, APRA only save Peru." At the same Fernando Belaunde also similarly attacked, they would say "communist", "mole in Moscow", etc.. Belaunde also took its slogan to defend against this charge: "Neither Right nor Left, Forward !!!".

Right basically has to date had two charges to those who will vie for political power: 1 terrorist, violent, extremist, etc. and 2 foreign agent, foreign server, power foreign servant of evil powers, etc. These two san-Benedictine have been placing a presidential candidate as uncomfortable (for them) has emerged. Both Victor Raul Haya de la Torre and Fernando Belaunde fought it as much as violent as agents of foreign interests. And although time has passed are doing exactly that. So Ollanta Humala has been linked to both phenomena as violent extremism and foreign interests (as there is no Soviet Union now the cuckoo Le Chant de Venezuela). But repeating the script that premiered a long time.

So now I'm not surprised that Susan Villarán the slander in the same manner. Although Dona Susana has been a good minister of the transitional government headed by Valentín Paniagua and has even been a champion of our national police. Sounds like a joke: they accuse of pro-terrorist or terrorist Ollanta Humala who put his chest against terrorism and Susana Villa who has been a leading defender of the Police of Peru and Minister of State. I think frankly miserable that defames a public official is a person or some stakeholders are mounted on an indictment that clearly is a smear, a smear campaign based on ignorance and indecency fujimontesinista style and its predecessors.

But an ill wind that blows no good I think we should respond calmly this sly campaign, with arguments, trying to use this condition for progress to open a space between the public sector looking for a modern left that serves the interests of the people. I think the left, but I like to see the public sector is not represented as where it belongs: not good for the stability of the country that a large segment of the public is not represented in our state. The Peruvian nation has every right to seek political stability and this stability may be tested when most citizens are properly represented and institutionalized can be channeled their demands through their representatives.

Much of our political instability because a great citizen sector has been excluded or marginalized from political representation. But this can not continue for long. It is logical that Peru also has a progressive representation more or less commensurate with their social base. We are not less than Chile, Brazil, Uruguay or another country with its progressive political representation more or less commensurate with their social base. The construction of a progressive in Peru must be viewed by progressives as the construction of a house, brick by brick, with a teaching on the people who have been subjected for decades to propaganda insidious must be removed gradually.

Greetings and my solidarity with a woman deeply honest and democratic convictions as Dona Susana Villaran. Edson

Baldeón

Recording A Show While Watching Another Show

THE VIAGRA AND RENEWAL POLICY. When elders are displaced by "old boys" MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC


What have you got to see the Viagra to political renewal? Well, a lot. And in this article try to explain this relationship. We can divide the life of the person into three parts. The first age, childhood and adolescence and early adulthood, would correspond to an incomplete personality: between physiology and their potential there is a gap. The child is selfish, insecure, the entire world revolves around him. The young man is concentrating on his body. In the second age, the physiological approaches its potential, the contented man in his own body, leaving your body and look for another: the woman, and together they make one. Everything that exists exists in the couple together as a whole. The forces of nature living in couples. It is the stage of realization with the formation of family and emotional stability. The elderly, old age, now longer than ever by the advances in medicine and increased standard of living, is when a man does, not in their own humanity (1 º age) and family (2 º age ), but community in society. In the 3 rd age man performs as a social being, turns its gaze to the community. Obviously these three ages of man are arbitrary, as they are mediated by all the vices of modern society and anomie as ours, but I serve as a general trend. I see it as three stages of human life but not so much psychological time (which could not be detached from the physiological).

then observe a general tendency of men to its expansion, from the inside out. First, solve the problem of his own body, then the body of others (his wife, children), and ends trying to work out as a social being in the "body" social (people who do not necessarily know). This seems to be the natural order of things. Like if you put the seed of life at one point and this point grows out of his body, and seeks to dissolve in around him, the social context. But what happens when this order is modified by the introduction of natural elements such as Viagra and the effects of new technologies, advances in medicine, etc..??

Now, if it is a general trend that people only in their 3 rd age to aim at the social it is also true that many people are oriented to the social in his youth. I myself have participated in politics since my teens. However, when young are inserted into the parties continue to accord priority your body and the body of others (your partner) rather than the policy itself (which is referred to persons not known, the imagined community, the common good, general interest , etc.), unless it thundered or upload any psychological malformation. I have lived in communities (parties) so I know not so much science. The natural tendency is for the youth policy is always an afterthought, or at least the middle of your daily interest is not politics. In the 3 rd age, however, is a natural tendency for the social. It seems that proximity to death forces the person to look as far as possible. Therefore tends his eyes to the social, and therefore politics.
Technology is changing this natural tendency, the dramatic increase in life expectancy, the remarkable increase in living standards, reducing the time and space by the introduction of technology in daily life has the effect of changing the natural tendency I have mentioned. What have you got to see then the Viagra to political renewal? I explain this: the youth is related to innovation, and this in the resolution, strength, determination, independence. And these are virtues in politics. The company looks good when young people displace old politicians.
But not only young people are thrown into power with speeches in support of the community, but also the old attempt to "rejuvenate." In fact, in Peru today are increasingly politicians who dye their hair, they enter the operating room to get some "deal worked out" and are regulars at the gym, and some even as a friend told me of the aging last week (which was the reason for writing this article) ingest resveratrol, the latter to take years "inside." Everything goes away from the mind of decrepitude, old age, death.
By focusing on the life world of the "old boys" 50 to 70 years away the prospect of death in their lives, and therefore what should be the natural tendency of approaching politics as a process corresponding to the stage of life to expand into society, is disrupted by an approach to political society motivated by material rewards to achieve the 'Step over power.
The involvement of the "old boys" from politics thus meet the general trend that I have described self-expansion of the personality, but they want power for power (characteristic of the 2 nd age). The strength of "old boys" of politics are the social networks that are armed with years of experience, more their knowledge. The knowledge and experience were what gave value to the 3 rd age. This is changing. With regard to knowledge, old age is no longer politically profitable at a time like the present where the knowledge does not accumulate in people but in the machines, and where change and innovation seduces society. They can always experience and this value is potentiated by the rapid changes in all spheres of life and the complexity of politics. The big boys of the 2 nd age have enough experience and political networks to take over politics.
It seems the trend is not the government of wise elders, whose vocation for the common good, completed its natural life cycle wrapped himself in politics naturally since the invention of democracy. Now, changes, and thus the fact that old age has been postponed (old no longer is 60 but at 70 years and over), and especially the fact that youth has become universalized as a political virtue makes youth is longer than before, and that the vocation of public affairs are relationships increasingly to power for power (characteristic of the 2 nd age) rather than a realization as a social characteristic of the 3 rd age. The bad, the downside is that the calls of nature to the completion of his personality turned over to the as a social common good (the elderly) have been virtually excluded from politics. The values \u200b\u200bof the world of politics have been disrupted. This also contributes to increased corruption. Contrary to what may be believed, the renewal of the policy would be increasingly difficult, the same faces are now more than ever a lot of things going for it to remain in the political establishment more years than their predecessors. And this despite the fact that society increasingly values \u200b\u200byouth and political renewal. More time on the management of public affairs bneficios moved by the materials available on the power increases the risk of greater corruption. And this

I wanted to get: the social bases of corruption. The person whose natural fulfillment was to meet with the common good as a social being (the elderly), the bearers of social ethics and excellence have been excluded from politics, leaving the political arena to fight of the 2 nd age ( the course of the 2 nd age, 30's-50's years with the "old boys of 60's-70's) struggle for the governance of society as a power play for power. The end result is a surge in corruption as social policy is passed, giving some support. Edson

Baldeón

All rights reserved. The ideas in this blog may be reproduced freely with only mention their authorship.