Caviars shit!
Who are the caviar and what is their ideology?? Yesterday
facebook read by someone shot at another "caviar of shit!" Just because your partner reminded him that Fujimori was involved with large-scale corruption. This prompted my reflection on who the caviar and what his ideology.
Just type "caviar" in google to introduce the origins of the term "caviar" in France. It is not my intention to repeat that. What is rather mean to say in how to conceptualize this is now called an adjective.
adjetiviza generally as "caviar" liberals in Peru: supporters of FTAs, investment, human rights and the market. These critics of traditional political parties, but they are political opponents of the Fujimori and APRA leadership and less on the radical left. A Peruvian liberals gave them the nickname of "caviar" especially because their liberalism is associated with the defense of human rights as it really is common among liberals about the world. Major
Liberal del Peru ("accused" of caviar), we have to Javier Perez de Cuellar (former UN Secretary General), Valentin Paniagua (Ex President of Peru), Diego Garcia Sayan (current president of the IACHR) Susana Villaran (Former Minister), Rosa Maria Palacios (the most influential TV journalist), Augusto Alvarez Rodrich (the most influential print journalism), Francisco Soberon (APRODEH President and one of the top 50 human rights defenders in the world ), Beatriz Merino (1 st woman Premier democracy in Peru and current Ombudsman), César San Martín (Judge to sentence Fujimori, and the only member of the Peruvian judiciary included among the 100 most influential Latin American characters, 2009), Julio Cotler (the most prestigious social scientists in Peru), Gustavo Mohme million (missing journalist and owner of one of the most prestigious newspapers Peru, The Republic), Gustavo Gutierrez (Priest, intellectual liberation theology and the Prince of Asturias Prize), Luis Bambaren (Former President of the Peruvian Episcopal Conference, one of the most influential Catholics today), Marco Arana ( principal ecologist and the most recognized international environmentalists of Peru today), Fernando Rospigliosi (Ex Minister of Interior and designated as agent of the Department of State USA), Marcial Rubio Correa (President of the PUCP, the most prestigious University of Peru), etc. To be objective, the three priests mentioned (Gutierrez, Bambaren and Arana) would converge not necessarily in liberalism but have been further qualified as "caviar" because of its anti-corruption record in defense of democratic institutions and especially because they make common force liberals in their fight against Fujimori. Many
"accused" as caviar, not all belong to the same organization, or even agree on various points of view on the development of country or read the national socio-economic reality, but are united mainly by the defense of liberal democracy, the market as the primary allocator of resources in society, human rights and political liberalism. As well as its fight against corruption, the vices of traditional politics and political extremism. Its main enemies are the politicians Fujimori and his allies. Another feature of the so-called "Caviars is that they are usually men and women of state, who are not involved in corruption and experienced administrative and governance. They are the liberal elite of state. They are different from the leftists in both are liberal by conviction, openly defend representative democracy and markets, and are different from the neo-liberals argue about the effectiveness of the state to take better advantage of international market, human rights and fighting corruption. Not correspond with the nationalists whose leader (Ollanta Humala) seen as a demagogue and statist.
What alienates viscerally of Fujimori, his intellectual and moral authority. No "caviar" was involved in corruption or violation of human rights while almost nonexistent in the Fujimori (and among its allies, as the current leadership APRA) someone who is not involved in corruption and / or human rights violations.
is therefore neither politics nor economics especially distinguishes the caviar of Fujimori and allies but corruption and violations of human rights. From there comes the visceral hatred of Fujimori to callers caviar, because they know they are, and feel less morally and intellectually and that provokes a deep hatred because they too would like to have some attributes of the liberal state they call " caviar "with disdain. The Fujimori is deeply despised by liberals and leftists despise time. The leftists despise Fujimori, but envy the "caviar" and try to hide their inferiority complex to the Liberals (or caviar) with a mock contempt. Just give a read to the files to realize that the Fujimori rank among the most deceitful and cynical political history of Peru, but the hatred of Fujimori to the liberal (or caviar) is sincere, is perhaps the most sincere they have. The most lumpenesca while political action is that which has been led Fujimori to the Peruvian liberals (caviar).
The Fujimori and his allies can not appear before their constituents as morally and intellectually inferior to their rivals, the Liberals or caviar, and to feel morally and intellectually inferior you is very hard, so they can not lose battles without appearances before the public. And can not rise higher than liberals try to reduce them, at least to people, try to remove it from morality to the citizenry. They accuse them of "caviar" that is drawing up proposals against poverty while having a comfortable life style. But they do not really serious, but as an insult, exaggerating the alleged wealth of the "caviar" and distorting the meaning when they are not proposals of the Liberals. For example, today the Commission has raised the Peruvian State to cover the costs of trials without due process, but the dome APRA and have fujimontesinistas this as "compensation" for terrorists, and of course, as if the Liberals were not in favor of the rule of law, but being "generous" with terrorists, if not accusing them of pro-terrorist. They want to distort reality, to present white as black as black and white born from a deep inferiority complex moral and intellectual development of Fujimori and his allies felt against the Liberals. It would be good to get a newspaper to say the files of a newspaper like The Commerce during an election year and count how many times the Fujimori and his allies have said to defend the poor and how assets and income received and compare them with the Liberals. It would be unusual for Fujimori to win in two areas: they have more properties and also are sold more as advocates for the poor.
In fact, both liberals (caviar) and the Fujimori and allies are political elites. And none of these two sides are a united group and are part of a joint organization and do not necessarily have personal ties or between or within each side. And only share general views, and stuff.
What unites the "anticaviares" are not political, but dislike the Liberals (to callers with disdain "caviar"). This is the reason that its definition of caviar is not political, but in tone and made adjectival qualifier.
The difference between a liberal and a liberal agenda, the same as that between a "caviar" and Fujimori. All or almost all follow the same coordinates neoliberal policies that Fujimori general, while all or nearly all liberals Peruvians are related to so-called "caviar."
A liberal (or "caviar") will always be liberal in political terms, a supporter of liberal democracy, fundamental market as allocator of resources, and defense of human rights. That is very similar to U.S. liberal. In fact, in Peru as "caviar" in the United States are liberal. Instead, neoliberals are extremists in favor of absolute market and crush all of the rights of workers and the consecration of transnational capital unambiguously even above human rights. Fujimori is the most extreme expression.
The neoliberals are a tiny minority overvalued by their resources (most from the state who say fighting) that make them powerful media attention. Liberals (or caviar) are also a minority, although they may envision the germ of what would be the first liberal party of the country. The Fujimori would see its political decline after the 2011 elections, however, Liberalism in Peru struggle to start new political and electoral viability. Greetings
Edson Baldeón
All ideas in this blog may be reproduced freely only specify its authorship. All Rights Reserved
0 comments:
Post a Comment