Plp Matlab Release 14

The PPK announced candidacy would raise serious problems for flight. Start your Peru has not led to the big leagues of national politics to no white after the demise of oligarchic state in 1968. When Fernando Belaunde Terry (the last white man, mature and Catholic, was elected president of Peru in 1980 actually was re-elected, having already ruled Peru before the government of the armed forces with Velasco.

No white candidate perceived as right was exalted by the votes of the popular sectors after the universalization of the vote in Peru. FBT was not perceived by the Peruvian citizenship as a target of right, but as a moderate who had left the APRA and the left and Luis Bedoya Reyes on the right. Unlike the case of PPK.

No white candidate perceived as right-elected in Peru after the great migrations of people from rural areas to cities, from the 80's, the formation of modern Lima and the emergence of cholo contemporary.

No candidate has won in Peru in recent decades has not in his own body (in your own physiology) the message of inclusion (Fujimori, Toledo, Susana Villar) or at least his image is not confronted with the inclusiveness (Alan Garcia, Castro, Andrade). PPK has not even relevant messages in physiology or your personal history: not a woman, or cholo, nor progressive, etc., A good candidate is the messenger of a better future but at the same time is, physiologically, part of that message. Not for PPK. In other words, can not play with the figure of Out siders.

No President in recent decades has been chosen to present as a guest for a party. Until Fujimori had his own party, Cambio 90. The PPK is invited to and / or supported by a group of games is against the perception of what Peruvians see as presidential leadership. No white


perceived as right-wing and has been elected president of Peru while taking U.S. citizenship as currently PPK. In fact, the U.S. is perceived as one of the men standing on the nationality of most Latin American countries, including, of course, the Peruvians.

All campaigns have an open discussion between citizens and this discussion has spun political sense citizens, and thus the political spectrum-election to the center-left especially in the last three months leaving misplaced candidates perceived as perceived right-wing or left-wing radicals. Peruvian

No candidate has raised the excitement of the broad strata of citizenship to 76 years age after the dissemination of the effects of information technologies, despite advances in medicine makes a person of 76 years today is not perceived as old as it would be about 20 years ago. The effects of general computer revolution and the technological revolution in Latin America makes it hard not only in Peru but throughout Latin America an ideal candidate or combine experience and youth is in the range of 45 to 65. PPK far exceeded the upper limit of this calculation.

All modern election campaigns in Peru have strengthened the candidates representing the opposition to political establishment. Unfortunately for today PPK his candidacy is seen as an establishment. If under President Toledo has had have been handling this issue as opposed to the current APRA government (which does not mean that a future political senses movement of people follow him placing in the anti-establishment).

Finally, no candidate has been promoted by his party or coalition of parties but by the very personal set of the candidate. In recent decades there has been the party or parties who have risen to the candidate until the triumph but the opposite has been the candidate who pulls his party. And take note, all candidates who have won have been presented as leaders of their parties, and not as a candidate of a coalition. PPK

have it hard ... Greetings


Edson Baldeón

Floating Boat Main Cinna

RANKINGS MOUNTAIN MARATHON MEDIA XII "VILLA DE Jarandilla"

Here you race classification click here.

Poptropica How To Have Guns

PROVISIONAL LIST OF REGISTERED

I remember that in addition to filling out the form ought to make payment as soon as possible and send it by fax or email, so that it contrasts. Thanks

PROVISIONAL LIST OF REGISTERED

Make A Rabbit Water Feeder

2010 EDITION

Good

Shortest Home Run Champion

Business Tanda Brite

Brite Life offers us not only a healthy lifestyle with the products we offer, offers a way of life exists with the creation of the Platform launch, also called Tanda based business SMEER system (Multiple System Evolution Exponential Online) which is one of a kind offer benefits not found in other multilevel companies.
To participate in the launch pad or course of business, all you have to do is buy a package of revenue with $ 200 pesos which contains all the information for doing business and this would be the first payment of your course of business also after 5 people must sign up for Each person will pay you 60 pesos, ie

But that's not all! The people you enroll, and must also enroll 5 each, you also get 60 pesos for each person they enroll

And that you will receive every month! And not all, also will pay a third level, ie as each person must get five people if all they do can have up to 125 people registered under you multiply it by 60! And that, as I said, it will be a month.
worth mentioning that this batch only lasts 6 months, but the purpose of this is capitalizarte (so ahce you have money) but why the company wants capitalizarte? Simple, to come into the company as a CRI (independent registered customer) and can fit even more people (up to 6 levels) and obviously you can earn more while consuming the products they offer, but I'll talk about this more Later (in another post probably)

And for that except (¬ ¬ there always are) who believe that this is a scam or "pyramid" as they call it, I can assure you that no, not only because I already paid me but because the same money that you pay at the beginning (200 pesos) is to pay people who are Top of you. " A portion of that money (60 pesos) is for whom you registered, another 60 pesos for those who are registered to him, another 60 pesos are for those who are above the latter, and the last 20 are, of course, for the company.

You wonder who wins this company? ADVERTISING! That's primarily what they do this, and not to "pull people" because at the end of the session, at the end of 6 months are not required to stay in business, you can take your money and retire ... but see everything Would they have won?

For more information visit http://www.britelife.com/ remember or can send me an e-mail to hansel_wow@hotmail.com

Thanks for reading and hopefully be given the opportunity. Greetings

Ennama For Sonstipation

What is Life?

Brite Life is a new Mexican company that is here to revolutionize the MLM in our country. But first let us see what is a multilevel company multilevel
Business
In this model, a person associated with a parent company as an independent or franchised and receive compensation based on the sale of goods or personal services and other associate members by that person. This pattern of distribution of products has been gaining importance in recent years due to increasing difficulty in selling consumers are increasingly closed to the bombardment of advertising to which they are subjected. Since the Network Marketing is based on the recommendation buzz by its consumers, distributors, market penetration is much higher, because consumers prefer to try a product recommended by an acquaintance, rather than by habérselo offered in an advertisement. In addition, Network Marketing offers a business opportunity to any of its consumers, who wants it, with low investment and a part-time position

Brite life has been based primarily on the underlined structure above the word of mouth recommendation, Unlike other such companies where you find out your customers to earn more money, Brite Life only have to worry about your own consumption in order to earn money based on the system SMEER (Multiple System Evolution Exponential Online)
Well I will leave this post up here so serve as an introduction (actually just created the blog and do not want to leave empty xD) if you prefer, you may consult http://www.britelife.com.mx/ for more information, anyway I will put other posts explaining more closely and more digestible information

Is There A Poem For When You Give A Plant

registration form

Here you have the registration form to download, you fill and you can send us by fax: 927560840 or e-mail:

deportejarandilla@gmail.com

(to facilitate registration be faster runners and we ask you simply relleneis registration form which is automatic. THANKS)

Nikon D60 Digital Field Guide

IN CAMPAIGN POLLS RESULTS AFTER THE "POTO" AUDIOS "


Comments surveys after the "potoaudios"

was watching the polls and support PUCP, in my opinion the most prestigious of Peru. Both agree almost perfectly in terms of primer and in terms of Decree. Both give advantage to Susan in primer 43 • IOP-PUCP and 42% Ipsos Apoyo, while Lourdes both give 28% in PBS and 26% card. In both polls Lourdes Susan wins in level A, while Susan beats Lourdes in all other socio-economic levels, with level in D / E is a huge difference for Susan. The antivoto against Lourdes has risen to 50% while for Susana Lourdes has dropped to 31% (IOP-PUCP). Susan wins in both women and men and in all ages, registering a staggering 50% to 29% among youth. Voting security is also favorable for Susana 38% to 25%. Finally, 56% believe that Susan will win, and only 30% believe that Lourdes.
What does this mean? The trends that have continued to come back, and probably (only probably) have accelerated or enhanced (this seems more likely) with the spread of the now popular "potoaudios." It also means that there are reasons (security of the vote, the antivoto, trends, etc.) to say it is very likely to continue rising and Lourdes Susana continue to decline. None of the figures moved to think otherwise. How will
Lourdes reacted against these latest results of the most prestigious polls? We leave to the imagination of Carlin.
The perception that Lourdes is the candidate of the rich may be reinforced by two facts that are emerging: First, the objective fact that the electoral niche of Lourdes is only Level A (which she called "fools" in the famous audio) and second, to the propaganda on TV. The more propaganda goal more the perception of "candidate of the rich."
was announced massive propaganda to FREDEMO TV. Not sure what finally reach out, but I hope we reach out. I am convinced that this will not alter the final result, but would have an effect (not desired by its promoters) would return eventually take out useless in 2011. I hope also that Susan does not take a single spot on TV. Why? Not required. Do not think because there is a difference of 10 points between the card and card means that this has to be saved by television broadcasting. No. Susana and their advisers need to understand that this dispute will compose naturally. First, the people tied to the candidate (Susan) and then later asks for the symbol). This has been happening. Last week, it marked not the FS was about 5%, now this percentage has risen to 10% that would be mostly new adherents of Susana. I do not think the election day the difference between the votes by ballot card and the difference gets less than 1%, insignificant against the probable difference of valid votes in his favor. Best to save that money and keep it for his party's campaign in 2011 que más falta le va a hacer. Además, si Susana no teme un centavo en TV dará un ejemplo democrático al resaltar la decisión de los ciudadanos que la intervención de los poderes fácticos. Y sentará un precedente para el 2011.

Para ganar, lo único que tiene que hacer Susana es lo mismo que ha venido haciendo hasta hoy: seguir caminando hasta el último día, una intervención de propuestas en el debate con Lourdes y ver el tema de los personeros (aquí serán claves sus aliados). O SEA UNA CAMPAÑA AUSTERA Y DECENTE. Nada más tendría que hacer para asegurar su victoria el 3 de octubre.
¿De qué forma Lourdes podría ganar? En mi opinión de ninguna forma. Lo I could do would be to lose with dignity, honor: Bayly attending the program, one on one refuting allegations that are made, not by attacking his opponent, be more natural to show their proposals especially during Sunday's debate. The advice of Lourdes is to lose with dignity in defense of democracy and the good of the city. Greetings

Edson Baldeón

Where Do You Find A Club Nintendo Card

ON" POTO-AUDIO "DE LOURDES FLORES


About poto-audio de Lourdes Flores:

1. How did you get the audio to Bayly? Do not forget that his production Jimena Ruiz worked for the campaign re-re-election of Fujimori, and not forget that Alex Kouri was involved in espionage cases the former President of the Callao Region Rogelio Canches.
2. Is it confirmed what he had heard about the consolation prize. In the audio is not only a person aggrieved, but also seems to be confirmed, at least by what you hear, what many called consolation prize of Lourdes seems so sorry.
3. "It harms the image of the candidate of decency? We are not against any person who gets upset and says things that do not say if he was calm. No. That is only part. The whole part is that Lourdes is not just any person, is nothing less than the champion of decency. An ordinary citizen might ask: If private is so different what is in public what gives me confidence and authority?
4. The wiretapping is something criminal (whose punishment for the police and judiciary), but citizens have the legitimate right to be interested in the political implications of the words of candidates.
5. If that is the attitude of a candidate in a situation perceived as difficult then citizens have the right to ask are you prepared emotionally for the position knowing that a government authority is a metropolis in their hand? PEOPLE ARE KNOWN IN THE CRITICAL MOMENTS WHEN THE BURN POTATOES. Because, of course, easy is out smiling in front of cameras when everything is normal, but the true personalities come out when there are difficulties. There is the temple, emotional intelligence and the actual capabilities of an authority. Fernando Andrade suggested that Lourdes was not qualified to be mayor because if a survey is altered in this way then how will the problems of Lima. This was a reflection of Andrade. Andrade might be exaggerating, but there may be people who have that view.
6. Regardless of our view, phrases like "the pot métanse mayor ..."," I do not care this election "or that this election is" the least of my matters in your life "," To what extent these frasespueden damage Lourdes Flores's candidacy or otherwise leave it "humanized"??
7. In the event that the humanized Would you should be "humanized" for illegal acts such as Susana chuponeos and not as she herself said the marijuana, the problems of their daughter, etc.?
8. Montesinos Practice "? No doubt, but the issue of the consultant and friend of Lourdes Flores, Xavier Barron, intends to press the head of a pollster Alfredo Torres and Lourdes agree to be involved in this is not a minor issue. Let's be clear PRACTICES ARE ALSO Montesinos. Here the candidate of the PPP has to give explanations of the case. Does not seem consistent sentencing practices Montesinos and practice them both when they agree.
9. Why Lourdes separates the Fujimori Montesinos? Is not this the discourse of which are removed from Fujimori Montesinos (who accuse him of all the bad government of Fujimori), damaging the good of the Fujimori government.
10. What basis have when accused of this audio fujimontesinismo?? In my opinion, the record is sufficient to suspect that these people do to promote the candidacy of Keiko Fujimori.
11. Be careful, these audios have many edges and gradually we will be discovering. As soon as Alfredo Torres has confirmed that people did meet with PPC "Discredits that anticipates the trend of the survey results to some candidates and not others??
12. And finally If you compete well in a municipal election under what conditions the presidential compete? What candidates are now being blackmailed without us knowing it?
13. Do you work victimization that has begun to test Lourdes Flores? Eye, one thing to have strong character (which they say show the audio) and a decent image warp that has worked to build (with chili and pepper that you are heard including trying to change survey results .) We will see even looong missing 15 days.
Greetings. Edson
Baldeón

Dimethicone Molecular Weight

Why lose Lourdes Flores?? Hildebrandt


Why lose Lourdes Flores??

Within a few days will be discussed why the rise of Susan and begin to discuss why lose (again), Lourdes Flores. At this point in the campaign, the potential variables have already made their appearance and dynamics are key to light. The cards are on the table.

If the polls are a scientific discipline and if they say the truth then the campaign to Lima and would have ended. If we consider that -According to the survey of IOP-PUCP the difference that separates Villa de Flores (to a point margin of error), the rapid growth of the core vote of Villa (from 4 to 23% in just one month), antivoto strong growth of Lourdes Flores (from 34 to 45% in a month), the entry of Susana Villaran forcefully in all socioeconomic strata (including the D / E has quadrupled its intention to vote in the last month, 18% do not know yet but soon will know and which surely will bring more votes to Lourdes, the effect of "wasted vote" that will benefit most Susana Villar to Lourdes, and the tendency of these two candidates in recent weeks, and with three weeks and it can be concluded tentatively that the campaign would have ended, at least in terms of the projection of the main variables. All cards are on the table.

What happens from now on only be the culmination of the prolongation of the variables that are already operating. There is no way that the polarization between Lourdes Flores Susana Villaran and disappears. There is no way that the third arises. Final strikeout of radical change by the JNE and the debate between the candidates hardly alter the general board projected. Followed current trends would beat Lourdes Villarán even more 5 points to Lourdes Flores and taking into account the limitations of the "vote of the ombudsmen" or the table can change the outcome. The chips are moved, and there is a check to the queen could not evade. In other words, the campaign and would theoretically finish. Lourdes Flores is unable to redirect the projected variables against which inevitably reach in the coming days. And almost always the winner or the winner in this case would not be a favorite of the start of the campaign. Peru is well.

The second question, the first left him for another article-is lost again Why Lourdes Flowers?? I can summarize the defeat of Lourdes Flores in 7 factors.

1) The implosion of the bid Kouri and bad campaign "egg." Kouri had too many enemies and weaknesses as enough video of Montesinos and tolls.

2) The issue Cataño crushed by opponents and journalists as Jaime Bayly. Receive hundreds of thousands of dollars from an accused drug dealer was important for the fall of Lourdes Flores, especially after the taint of Kouri. Excluding the "greater evil" what sense would continue backing the "lesser evil"? Many proponents of Lourdes Susana migrated to town, after the exclusion of Kouri, something Lourdes strategists never anticipated.

3) The initial approach of the campaign of Lourdes taking into account only so that Kouri was dislocated when he was excluded from electoral competition, and the fact that Lourdes is the same to be added to the dirty war against Susanna to put "buts" to audit the management of Castañeda, and fatal, that the fall of Kouri proportions are wrong: relating to his opponent with subversion and violence. The fatal error was that the lie against a backdrop of revolution in the media could not function.

4) Susana Villaran's charisma, his honest image and moderate, and strong team of municipal government, and also the fact that it is the only progressive candidate in this campaign. All anti-establishment forces advocating his candidacy.

5) The role of intellectuals and influential journalists who supported it: almost all intellectuals showed sympathy for Villarán and rejected the dirty war against contributing to the "boomerang effect." César Hildebrantd, Mirko Lauer, Alberto Adrianzen, Sinesio Lopez, Santiago Pedraglio, Rosa María Palacios, Nelson Manrique, Augusto Alvarez Rodrich, Antonio Zapata, Rocio Silva, Pedro Salinas, etc.

6) The counter-campaign against dull Susana Villaran Aldo whose greatest exponents M (with its cover along with Abimael Villarán) and Chichi Valenzuela (with their crude photomontages) helped greatly in the dissemination of the nomination Villarán at a crucial time, just drop and when Kouri undecided voters began to be interested in seeking any nominations. Better, impossible.

7) The continuing search for the new part of the electorate. Political instability stems largely because it is not adequately represented, progressivism is sidelined and the other part is simply excluded. So that in recent weeks, these pockets of votes opt for the anti-establishment generally, and there Lourdes has everything to lose.

In my opinion, the alternative to victory for Lourdes Flores are really minimal, and are extra-political side: A dirty war and the intense control of the "votes of the ombudsmen." But this alternative is extremely risky for you and for democracy, especially when you consider that the gods seem to have left her or she just said: "I see my life are about birds of ill omen."

Greetings. Edson

Baldeón

How Many Calories In Toothpaste

: 4 QUESTIONS THE VOTE TO DECIDE WHAT TO EXPECT


When I was young to decide my vote was simple: always voted left. A ideological voting, principled, elementary. Come the gray and one is realizing that things are not so simple.

Today, I do 4 basic questions to decide who to vote for: 1. Who has clean hands, 2. Who has done an efficient, 3. Who defends democracy and freedom, 4. Who promotes social justice and a better distribution of opportunities.

The first two questions seem less ideological, until a little political, but end up being very important. Leftists who steal, there are also. Political ineffective and clumsy, are in every store, can be good for election campaigns but unable have good projects and realize them. Sometimes it is better to someone who does not make great changes we want, but to do good things for people, before knowing that Castaneda had tremendous kebab with the Comunicore, I had that impression of him, with initiatives such as stairs, Solidarity hospitals and parks that are good for the people of Lima. The nearly 30 million stolen Lentopolitano Comunicore and costing 300 million over budget, another reality show.

first 2 Along with these basic questions, corruption and efficiency, most policies are: democracy and social justice, which are the broad guidelines that define me understand a modern left. I do not like dictators to concentrate power and impede the freedoms, and government dedicated to supporting the enormous injustice that cross our country.

to assess based on these 4 questions to candidates in an election, you have to hear the speeches but also see their shares, they have actually done. Indeed, the answers are not always so clear, but these questions to me are for weighing alternatives. Let

a quick review of the candidates for Lima. Let's start with you might be out of the race, Alex Kouri. Corruption: With a toll that we stole tens of millions of soles for his family firm, not hands are clean but quite dirty. Efficiency: Some think it has good management, but do not know that the Callao has a budget similar to Lima with an eighth of population, which has much more money or do not know that between 2007 and 2009 the government Callao regional left Kouri chaired by running 200 million soles of your budget, 200 million in his account that did not use for his province. Democracy: If Kouri in the parlor of the INS negotiated settlement with Montesinos was not enough sample of its bureaus, the jump in this election from one party to another are no internal election to complete the shape. Social Justice: PPP leader, an ally of Fujimori and Alan Garcia has always been on the side of the rich. With 0 to 4, 4 answers wrong in any way vote for him.

On with Lourdes Flores. Corruption: the person has to defend an accused drug dealer and collect a million suns to defend the entry of used cars that pollute the city, but still can not be accused of stealing. Efficiency: they have no experience of governance, so we can not qualify it as inefficient, even if inexperienced. Democracy: was in the fight against dictatorship, crushing at times, but was, to his credit. Social justice: the right PPC is recalcitrant, the strongest advocates of neoliberalism, they do not want a better distribution of wealth. In short, Lourdes has 1 answer for, 2 against, 1 half, neither has my preference. Susana Villaran

. Corruption: completely clean, nobody can get any charges of wrongdoing or links to drug traffickers or thieves. Efficiency: former minister of women and implemented a budget of 300 million soles, and did well at a difficult time, shortly after the fall of Fujimori when he had to clean up and rebuild the institutions. Democracy: the wad in the fight against the dictatorship, leading the Coordinator of Human Rights when burned potatoes and the risks were great, only that it is highly commendable. Social Justice in favor of redistribution and social rights activist in a social and Christian left that led her to live in the Rimac and found the first experience of a glass of milk helps families affected by the crisis. Susana add 4 good answers, my preferences are clear.

Humberto Lay. Corruption: looks clean, and religion helps. Efficiency: no management experience, his party has not fared very well or with members of Congress (anyone remember who they were or know where they are?) Or its candidates (few weeks before the registration of another candidate lists submitted by his party, he went to another store policy). Democracy: I do not know who has or thinks about it, but that have a social base of his parishioners did not sound right. Social Justice: top advisor to PPK is clear that kicks to the side of the powerful. Although I have doubts about some answers, Lay not pass the fence.

could go with others, but I think that's enough for now. As always, there is no ideal candidate. Life is like that: nothing is perfect. But we now have a very good candidate, a very good list, and we must seize the opportunity to vote with gusto, with enthusiasm, with hope. Not for the lesser evil but good may come. I will mark the boxes with the FS in these elections in Lima.

крэк на Vocal Remover

SUSANA IN THE DEBATE?? THE LIE OF ALDO


In July, Susana Villaran was 4% according to PUCP. Actually ranges from 3 to 5%, according to several polls. And he had a support several times the level A / B socio-economic level D / E. For example, while in July gave 1% at level D / E. Now in August in the same sector D / E has risen to 6%, or had sextúpliocado their level of acceptance according to the survey PUCP lower levels of Lima.

Lay in July had an 8% acceptance level D / E shows a rise and reached 12%, or an increase of 50%. Humberto Lay has been promoted in 2006 as presidential candidate and then as a municipal candidate in social media. Susana Villar has been less publicized in the mainstream media. So if at first this season Lay enjoyed municipal preference among the popular classes is likely to be because they know more, not to enjoy more sympathy Susana net. This can be seen on the results of surveys of the past two months. In the last month as Susan grew by 600% at level D / E Humberto Lay grew 50% over the same period of time from the same socioeconomic level. BECAUSE THAT IS A MYTH THAT SUSANA have limited potential in this sector. And the truth is rather that while they know the are accepted. Eye only in the last days Susana is being promoted in the areas of mass communication. The results of this may just be the next survey in September. The trend is apparently a growth.

In my opinion, should be directed to Susan Villarán every effort at the grassroots, and must do so by changing his address at the bottom and form. If you want to go to the poor and make the poor must show firmness, strength in his words, the things he says. The poor, even by a long family tradition, give in to the poses of force decision. The nuances are no preference in this sector show as a reflexive or intellectual doubt not seem to be very productive if it votes to make sure in these sectors. In addition to force the image of expertise is another quality that they value the poor, which should show that has figures, figures verbally expressing that although the poor do not understand clearly do understand that it dominates the subject, which has been prepared and that there is someone who met him at the nomination. The power of force and the preparation does not require any pose Susan theoretical thinking in the debate today. One important thing: to make public mention of his resume: he was Minister of State, who was Police Ombudsman, an official of the Ministry of Interior and also is an expert on Public Safety. Poor people love successful people. If he says no candidates who have no experience in government as she has directed the State to Valentin Paniagua, will certainly be very enlightening for the poor of their capacity. Something highly valued among these sectors. That

Susana also note that the poor always hope to gain little something, if you can technically support the bonus of 100 soles for each family will undoubtedly have an impact among the working class, but if only the states and not technically supported reactionary media's going to mash, they're going to ridicule and will lose credit with popular sectors.

Now that both Kouri and Lourdes have been weakened by questions that compromise their ethics Susana public should make it clear, and express verbally that she is a person whose record of honesty has never been discussed in contrast to what happens with Kouri and Lourdes.

is not true that the poor do not like honesty. Everyone will always be in favor of honesty. Of course, as you wonder if you agree with them steal even though they obviously works then coerce their freedom of choice, and only then conjure up statements like that are agreed to steal but they do work. This does not apply if at the same Time does not raise the possibility of being together for work to be done without stealing.

Strength, Solidarity, experience, technical efficiency and incorruptibility must transmit to the poorer classes to which they must appeal to win this election. .

In short, Susan is trying to get a teflon containing media attacks on his opponents to liberalism, because right now she has become the representative of liberalism and must be expected to be a victim in the coming weeks especially tending account of the popular sector which has to win at all costs. If Susan get to go up between the popular sector will definitely Lay out of the race. Just may try to form a new polarization with Lourdes Flores Nano, leaving Alex Kouri definitely excluded. If Sue accomplished that feat then a growing sector of middle-class voters meditate leave Lourdes and support the candidacy of Villarán. And the nomination of Susan can help you be a real option for Lima municipal government. Greetings

Edson Baldeón

Telephone Line Transferletter

M.


Today newspaper front page Mail has published the following headline: "Susan do not be pine needles, the Popular Action Slams. What do you mean daily? Jaime Bayly last Sunday, account for a debate This week sponsored by the newspaper El Comercio, said that Joy Gonzalo has not been invited, so ask your interviewee, Susana Villaran whether to invite Gonzalo.

"You would ask to include Gonzalo Joy in the debate?" Asked the reporter to Villa, to which she replied: "Yes .. He wanted to go with us (in the campaign), that is to imagine ".

Where is the alleged lie? Edmundo E Eagle interview. He reportedly said: "It was she, Villar, who approached because we had no closer why.


Aldo M. distorts things. And create your own news to your taste, and as judge and jury and without any inquiry even minimal research evaluates, judges and sentencing. Susan did not interview, did not ask her point of view, not asked to clarify the meaning of his expression when it is obvious that the response of Villa can be equated to the following:

"Yes, I would like to participate in the debate Joy because we have excellent relations. " But he pulls the news over the side without much foundation. And this is bad for journalism.

Aldo M. Lies is that Susan Joy said never approached her or that she went to Alegria go together in this campaign. Or even address the issue. Susana said only that "He wanted to go with us all. If someone wanted to know who called whom they could ask and I do not Villarán Susana Gonzalo Joy or have reason to lie. Who misrepresents things by Montesinos style, Aldo M. distorts things, acopmoda to defame a candidate. Should be reported both in the journalistic profession as a criminal.

The truth of the story is this: at the beginning when Joy arrived in Peru, (eye who lived in Spain until recently, so as Kouri continuity of residence would not in Lima, but no one has crossed), and probably realized that his options were low was pre-arrangement with Susan for a joint bid (who contacted who do not know) and agreed to endorse Susan, well , within the Popular Action party that has joined recently and was recommended Joy JAO and the sole candidate. AP militancy ve'ñia not this well and never knew if the President or Vice President were aware or authorized these conversations. When the alliance was almost a given, Congressman Yohny Lescano, Secretary General of PA, went to half and disavowed JOY PUBLIC GONZALO, told the AP will not ally with anyone and that the lamp WOULD SOLA and in any case, neither the Secretary General as neither party had been authorized to Joy to any alliance, it was so the alliance with Susana Villaran collapsed. This news came out in the media and was public. Eagle now says that the alliance fell apart by about Villa with MNI. In any case this is just made public.

is not accurate nor what Joy said, I do not lie, maybe he was misinformed, as I understand that the Social Force talks with the NMI and the Father Arana come from behind. But beware that if you read carefully at any time or Joy or deny Edmundo Del Aguila Susana Villaran, simply refer another topic that Susan had not discussed. Aldo M. use the words of the leader and candidate AP to twist things and defame a candidate. And that is the manipulation of this pseudo-journalist who should be remembered often said that AP was gone and wrote both FBT pests as Valentín Paniagua. How many times have angered militants sent explanatory letters to this piedrodista? (Yes, piedrodista). Both Joy, Eagle and Susan have been victims of this gentleman.

is not possible for a national newspaper in the hands of a character clearly unbalanced, extreme, McCarthy and a liar and manipulator. Journalism must be left in the hands of journalists rather than the unbalanced. Its sad role of editor of the daily mail has reached the point that the email has the merit of publishing the most racist article of the world, fueling the state terrorism against the indigenous population, as the English "Survival." Just read your pages to realize that this is not a serious newspaper but to a lampoon chicha.

Aldo M. Fear Villarán's bid to have no basis in reality. Progressivism so afraid he's doing a dirty war against Susan for more than a week, what a coincidence, just as Susan begins to grow strongly. Can not say not pulled or 0.5%?? Do not say that the Popular Action party was a non-existent? How it must hurt to Aldo M. see the growing popularity of Dona Susana. Poor have to endure, because Susan is growing and so do not think patelee stops. We see that Fujimori still missing. Greetings. Edson Baldeón.

Husbands With Earrings

Susana, Kouri, Lourdes, Lay, the campaign .... PUTI-SURVEYS


If any good can be drawn from the exclusion of Kouri of the campaign is that the dirty war is not going to be as much as if Kouri, will surely be hard, dirty and all, but Kouri would be worse.
The second is that this exclusion of polarization just Kouri Lourdes-Kouri: if there is no greater evil Why there should be a lesser evil?
In 3 rd place, increase swing votes in the coming days. Surely the undecided leaving the herd of Kouri will follow a couple of weeks, but it's hard to be where Lourdes in high proportion for the simple reason that most of the voters of Lourdes were adhered to contain Kouri, but now that Kouri is a lot of people may ask "Now why I'm voting for Lourdes?? Obviously and without detracting from Lourdes will have to rethink his campaign speech for decency vs. corruption seems exhausted both in Cataño (which is a reality) as output Kouri. What favor is she known Lourdes, and the people who voted for Kouri comes mainly from marginal areas, leaving some points Kouri go directly among the best known and there that something chape Lourdes, but I do not think many.
In 4 th place, the exclusion of Kouri could boost the candidacy of the other candidates, especially that of Susana Villar is already rising in the polls in recent days, following the scandal of Lourdes has received money from (a) Cataño a few weeks ago. In reality it is likely that the votes of Kouri allocated among all candidates, especially between Susan and Lay. Care with Lay now has more people coming from the popular sectors are finally defined the election, he could be the one favored by Fujimori and APRA.
In 5 th place, all candidates need to urgently rethink their campaigns to get votes of Kouri, and Lourdes will eventually lose. While the latter needs to rethink its campaign to keep the winnings., As it has very little room to convince the undecided.
In 6 º a more open setting, without the polarization Kouri vs Lourdes invited to delimit the central theme of the remainder of the season. Chance he will have the strength to define the axis campaign, as the former decency axis vs corruption has been almost exhausted, and in any case hereafter could be used against itself Lourdes (Chestnut weighs and weigh). The only ones that have the power to impose a new main theme at the moment are Susana Villaran and Lourdes Flores, especially the first one coming from behind, hard and find Lourdes without speaking of the greater evil (for Kouri) with which contained the other candidates. Kouri The exclusion can mean a pyrrhic victory for Lourdes Flores to have raised his campaign taking into account only Kouri as criticized weeks ago. Now, Lourdes has the challenge of accommodating the new electoral landscape. If you can do to win, and deserve to win it would have beaten Kouri and Susan, but if it fails to give a reading according to the electoral reality which makes moving your chips erratically lost and would be equally well-deserved defeat. I think at this moment Lourdes continues to have the upper hand and if you win or lose will be your responsibility. His voting record leaves room for doubt.
in 7 th place, it is important that both APRA would like Fujimori, because without Kouri they run out of candidates, and I do not abstain. What you can do is strengthen Lay, I think the latter would have more chance. Have against Lay time. If Susan does a certain polarization to Lourdes then there could be consolidated Lay.
At this point in the Campaign Command of Aunt Susy must be two certainties: 1 being the best moment so far in the campaign, and 2 with the imperative to go hunting for votes sectors. Susana
Villarán In my opinion still has a greater potential in the middle classes which will come to surface when they see a Social Force begins to grow in the popular sectors.
Getting to the grassroots? Here Sue is a twofold task: to reach and also convince to vote for her. Maybe a double play will be productive: Zoom
1, Lourdes people through the dissemination of conservative pro-rich vs cucufato popular sentiment and people's defense.
2 ° Approach people with a strategy of entertainment and education. Another measure to win over youth and working classes would stick to a strategy of entertainment. Its media presentations should be aimed at these people who are looking for entertainment policy. The poor work as a policy can not be seen but as an outlet for their everyday problems. Their own physical bodies asked to make their daily eutoexpandir their sensibilities affected by their work in a context of poverty, and this is achieved through entertainment. Not necessarily appeal to the reason why the reasoning is a bit tiring, physically tired to note that they are tired, your daily life is very tiring to come give me more chamba someone making me think. Therefore, he must link his candidacy to the entertainment if you go with some success to the popular. But the people of the popular sectors place their trust in those who make you feel to protect them, who will look after their interests, and has sufficient strength, insight, and street to get there. Confidence among the middle class has to do with honesty, decency, etc. but the trust between the classes has to do, besides this, also the ability of the custodian of such trust is smart enough, cunning and "travel" (clever, "fly") so they can defend their interests. Therefore a work of political teaching is important among the popular classes. But a modern teaching horizontal language. Susan is able to achieve this in better shape than Lay. Susana Lourdes before facing the final battle has to defeat Lay in the imagination of the popular sectors. In the survey today of Ýpsos Support is seen that Lay has more acceptance among the popular classes Susana. Furthermore, both the dome and the Fujimori APRA appear closer to Susan Lay.
Remember the doll "shower" of Valentin Paniagua. At no time this discredited Dr. Paniagua. Appealing to entertainment does not necessarily mean losing seriously. People understand very well that the central campaign is to develop a strategy for votes. And it looks good who does not understand this. Attend cutting popular programs does not mean losing seriously. Take advantage of all the spaces can also be a sign that being elected authority will do everything possible to achieve the objectives set, or as synonymous with political decision, courage, bravery and these are seen as virtues by the people below. For the reason that they always expect a change, any change that is significant enough to get them where they are. Do not really think, in reality to embarrass them think, just feel it and not clearly, but it's there you have it as a natural response to its daily toil. How else can appeal to entertainment? The images (and talk about the doll Chaparrón) are vital, what you see, you have to consider that merely to see on the screen must mean voter below some entertainment but that does not mean they will vote for you. They simply will be pleased and you then have to knit another strategy that you were pleased to vote for you. And they only vote for you if you are a winner. People generally below (and also those of medium and above) prefer to vote in reference to the winner, either supporting, or giving the counter. But always revolve reference to the figure of the winner. Sometimes support those listed as winners in their attempt to "share" the joy of the winners if only by not know what strange psychological procedure. Sometimes the attack to "share" the battle the pound counterweight which appears as if the candidate winning the counter-power "liaison" with their aspirations and be the hope, anger, jealousy, sacrifice, innovation, or any other feeling that is saved without knowing it, without even establishing why. Thus vote with or against Lourdes Lourdes, which could lead to possible bias or Lourdes to Susan Lay, depending on who I could excel.
Any successful strategy must move away from what people know, you think. Do not try to reinvent the wheel in an election campaign. And people do believe that Lourdes favors the rich, it is falling pituca and avocado and cucufato. Regardless of whether this is true or not this can be used in a campaign strategy. This idea must be crushed to have real effects among the popular classes and the youth. And it has to be until they invade social politics.
If Susan wants to win at Lourdes has to "close" the court. You have to raise the pitch that suits you: liberalism vs civic cucufatería, defending the working class vs. the candidate of the rich. Eye that never goes out of fashion among the popular sectors. With which also contains Lay. Susana
have to close the field polarizing the campaign between her and Lourdes, and thus to contain the third nomination. That people do not be fooled Social Forces, Lourdes is still favorite, I imagine that by now must have a potential of 40% with the addition of the candidacy of Lourdes (despite appearances) is down while Susan is uphill, it also has the pressure of winning and background in the output stage is flat, all of which can be exploited for Susana. Six weeks is more than enough to turn the match Susana. Susan has to take every possible space in the media. His first battle to win is called Humberto Lay, and later they will be with Lourdes. And to win both battles tine to support the popular classes. Can you?

Meagan Good Foto Nuda

opinion studies can be seen as manipulative, opinion formers public or as tools fectivamente reflect the opinion of a timely matter. I will not refer to the nature of the surveys but the comment appeared in the last few hours, the CPI (with some credibility) and the datum (with any credibility, given his background. Generally, I am guided by the results of Support I seem most respectable, or the PUCP.

But despite the unreliability of a survey, for example, of datum, must reflect some truth about any matter, within the range of error. Always is good to note that the nominations progreistas will fall within the error range (2 or 3 points) and related applications over to the media or the economic power it would rise a few points within the error range (2 or 3 points). At least, I read the polls. This with the polls "serious." So you have to take with tweezers numbers.

always useful surveys. Just know how to interpret. Can not read literally IDIC for example when we know that favors the APRA or who want to promote this game. DATUM must also be carefully observed, the same CPI.

Entering the final published results. Both CPI and DATUM are two signals which are of concern to Lourdes as Korui: 1 for the first time has stopped the constant rise of Lourdes since February 2010. and not only his rise has stopped but it has fallen, both the stop and the drop has happened in a matter of days is something of concern to Lourdes. and 2 that a third option (not Lourdes vs Kpouri first appeared) Susana Villaran up between about 80 and 120% of their voting intentions.

For 1 st time this season goes Susana Villaran up. Since the mayor presented the saw between 3 and 4%, but now it has jumped (in both surveys) to more than 8%. What is in short recent data from the last polls published? in my opinion means that for the first time opens the possibility of entry of a third party Susana Villar, and in 2 nd place these facts mean that the counter-campaigns do work.

against what they say Raul Vargas, these counter-campaigns have real effects and fast, so much so that when they launched attacks Kouri fell more than 10 points (some to more than 15 points) and when he attacked Lourdes not only stopped his constant promotion, but for 1 st time also down about 3 points in a few days (and eye we're talking about polls as CPI and DATUM who always Cultural UP generous with Lourdes) and Susan can be interpreted as a reorganization of its potential, I think Susan was relegated because they had no visibility and appeared as a wasted vote, but now that it has received more visibility, people start to see it begin to value and assess it positively. To the extent that if a cross out of race for reasons Kouri domicialiarios who would immediately jump Susana Villaran and that dispute finally be mayor of Lima Lourdes Flores and Susana Villaran thus change the focus of the debate leaving behind what Decency vs corruption by a duo: honesty vs. corruption and left vs. right. And then for the first time since February Lourdes would be likely to fight uphill sto quee risk mean to her.

And this is what is feared as the ranks of PPC. And so Aldo Mariçátegui both attacks. Not a day in which the wayward Director of Mail, Aldo M. not associated with extremism or violence if not with terrorism. What Susan is not sure, could be because it could not happen. Depend on the fate of Kouri, how to leave the trial of Cataño, and the reaction of APRA and I do not think Fujimorismo stay idly, especially depends on what you do or not do Susanna and her command campaign. Let's see how it goes. Carlos Roca at the moment just to show strong resistance to giving up his candidacy by APRA. I copy the video of yesterday, Monday, August 10 responds strongly to the dome and APRA said that his resignation as it is stated would be "impossible" to accept. In this video Carlos Roca also realizes that the APRA CEN spoke of "FAVOERECER A LOW AS Kouri." I also talk about the polls "You know how to handle the polls?" And also noted that the CEN APRA should not be appendix of the Political Committee and that it should not be "appendix" of the Presidency. So, Alan Garcia declared war. Let's see how this ends.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqQO_qKSDRE Greetings. Edson
Baldeón

Hannah Montana Encuera,fotos

SUSANA terrucos?? On McCarthyism in Peru



A the candidate for the Municipality of Lima, Susana Villaran, have jumped "complaints" over alleged links with the violence, extremism and even terrorism. Doña Susana replied that a campaign that is indecent, ignorant and McCarthy. What's behind all this??

all started with a "claim" of a candidate from the PPC, which noted that among the candidates for aldermen of the list would Susana Villaran former MRTA terrorists but never said any names which would constitute a defamation, but apologized Lourdes to Susan and she accepted this apology. However, members of the PPC still repeating the san-benito of terrorism, violence, extremism Susan course without providing any evidence or even reasonable evidence. This newspaper has joined Mail across its front page showed a wolf dressed in sheep's red and white on his chest a sickle and hammer. In Peru, among the common people sickle and hammer means blood, death, destruction, terrorism, namely the campaign against Villa is linked to terrorism to curb its rise especially when the leading candidate Lourdes Flores and Alex Kouri have been seriously questioned. The slogan seems to be tackling Susana arising as a third option now announcing that a new poll by CPI would have risen a few points.

But why try to put Anguie recognized as democratic as Susana Villaran nicknamed terrucos terrucos or pro?? Because until now has been running, though in truth very fairly. Like they did with Toledo when he drew as violent, with the red headband and everything, and end up being a good president or acceptable for most Peruvians. Susana Villaran It has been a good Minister for Women and a good defender of the police. Another victim of this campaign was Ollanta Humala, who in recent years as a pro you want to appear when Ollanta Humala terrorist fought on the ground with terrorists, risking his life. What is known is only presidential candidate who has been part of military emergency in areas where the terror was at its peak.

within a few months ago the same newspaper also pulled Mail on its front page to the terrorist Abimael Guzman and Elena Iparraguirre with Father Arana (who defames calling him "anti-mining" when in fact the father Arana opposed to mining but not some environmental policies of some mining), that is not the first time that this newspaper is paid for these bells. Is also known that the wayward Director of Mail, that Aldo M., has been "rewarded" by the English "Survival" as the world's most racist journalist for an article which is called state terrorism. Other newspapers that always come to this type of bells are Express and Reason, both linked to what is known as the mafia fujimontesinista Coincidence??

But if anyone thinks that this comes with the Shining Path terrorism is wrong, the story is even older. Long before the madness of SL, Victor Raúl Haya de la Torre is also saddled with the same similar accusations from their media called him a terrorist, violent, sectarian, extremist, etc. since insurgió against so-called oligarchic state in the first half of the twentieth century, reviled him as violent, communist agent Soviet, etc. To prove just read the newspapers of the time at the National Library. From there it's SEASAP "Neither Moscow nor with Washintong, APRA only save Peru." At the same Fernando Belaunde also similarly attacked, they would say "communist", "mole in Moscow", etc.. Belaunde also took its slogan to defend against this charge: "Neither Right nor Left, Forward !!!".

Right basically has to date had two charges to those who will vie for political power: 1 terrorist, violent, extremist, etc. and 2 foreign agent, foreign server, power foreign servant of evil powers, etc. These two san-Benedictine have been placing a presidential candidate as uncomfortable (for them) has emerged. Both Victor Raul Haya de la Torre and Fernando Belaunde fought it as much as violent as agents of foreign interests. And although time has passed are doing exactly that. So Ollanta Humala has been linked to both phenomena as violent extremism and foreign interests (as there is no Soviet Union now the cuckoo Le Chant de Venezuela). But repeating the script that premiered a long time.

So now I'm not surprised that Susan Villarán the slander in the same manner. Although Dona Susana has been a good minister of the transitional government headed by Valentín Paniagua and has even been a champion of our national police. Sounds like a joke: they accuse of pro-terrorist or terrorist Ollanta Humala who put his chest against terrorism and Susana Villa who has been a leading defender of the Police of Peru and Minister of State. I think frankly miserable that defames a public official is a person or some stakeholders are mounted on an indictment that clearly is a smear, a smear campaign based on ignorance and indecency fujimontesinista style and its predecessors.

But an ill wind that blows no good I think we should respond calmly this sly campaign, with arguments, trying to use this condition for progress to open a space between the public sector looking for a modern left that serves the interests of the people. I think the left, but I like to see the public sector is not represented as where it belongs: not good for the stability of the country that a large segment of the public is not represented in our state. The Peruvian nation has every right to seek political stability and this stability may be tested when most citizens are properly represented and institutionalized can be channeled their demands through their representatives.

Much of our political instability because a great citizen sector has been excluded or marginalized from political representation. But this can not continue for long. It is logical that Peru also has a progressive representation more or less commensurate with their social base. We are not less than Chile, Brazil, Uruguay or another country with its progressive political representation more or less commensurate with their social base. The construction of a progressive in Peru must be viewed by progressives as the construction of a house, brick by brick, with a teaching on the people who have been subjected for decades to propaganda insidious must be removed gradually.

Greetings and my solidarity with a woman deeply honest and democratic convictions as Dona Susana Villaran. Edson

Baldeón

Recording A Show While Watching Another Show

THE VIAGRA AND RENEWAL POLICY. When elders are displaced by "old boys" MANAGEMENT OF PUBLIC


What have you got to see the Viagra to political renewal? Well, a lot. And in this article try to explain this relationship. We can divide the life of the person into three parts. The first age, childhood and adolescence and early adulthood, would correspond to an incomplete personality: between physiology and their potential there is a gap. The child is selfish, insecure, the entire world revolves around him. The young man is concentrating on his body. In the second age, the physiological approaches its potential, the contented man in his own body, leaving your body and look for another: the woman, and together they make one. Everything that exists exists in the couple together as a whole. The forces of nature living in couples. It is the stage of realization with the formation of family and emotional stability. The elderly, old age, now longer than ever by the advances in medicine and increased standard of living, is when a man does, not in their own humanity (1 º age) and family (2 º age ), but community in society. In the 3 rd age man performs as a social being, turns its gaze to the community. Obviously these three ages of man are arbitrary, as they are mediated by all the vices of modern society and anomie as ours, but I serve as a general trend. I see it as three stages of human life but not so much psychological time (which could not be detached from the physiological).

then observe a general tendency of men to its expansion, from the inside out. First, solve the problem of his own body, then the body of others (his wife, children), and ends trying to work out as a social being in the "body" social (people who do not necessarily know). This seems to be the natural order of things. Like if you put the seed of life at one point and this point grows out of his body, and seeks to dissolve in around him, the social context. But what happens when this order is modified by the introduction of natural elements such as Viagra and the effects of new technologies, advances in medicine, etc..??

Now, if it is a general trend that people only in their 3 rd age to aim at the social it is also true that many people are oriented to the social in his youth. I myself have participated in politics since my teens. However, when young are inserted into the parties continue to accord priority your body and the body of others (your partner) rather than the policy itself (which is referred to persons not known, the imagined community, the common good, general interest , etc.), unless it thundered or upload any psychological malformation. I have lived in communities (parties) so I know not so much science. The natural tendency is for the youth policy is always an afterthought, or at least the middle of your daily interest is not politics. In the 3 rd age, however, is a natural tendency for the social. It seems that proximity to death forces the person to look as far as possible. Therefore tends his eyes to the social, and therefore politics.
Technology is changing this natural tendency, the dramatic increase in life expectancy, the remarkable increase in living standards, reducing the time and space by the introduction of technology in daily life has the effect of changing the natural tendency I have mentioned. What have you got to see then the Viagra to political renewal? I explain this: the youth is related to innovation, and this in the resolution, strength, determination, independence. And these are virtues in politics. The company looks good when young people displace old politicians.
But not only young people are thrown into power with speeches in support of the community, but also the old attempt to "rejuvenate." In fact, in Peru today are increasingly politicians who dye their hair, they enter the operating room to get some "deal worked out" and are regulars at the gym, and some even as a friend told me of the aging last week (which was the reason for writing this article) ingest resveratrol, the latter to take years "inside." Everything goes away from the mind of decrepitude, old age, death.
By focusing on the life world of the "old boys" 50 to 70 years away the prospect of death in their lives, and therefore what should be the natural tendency of approaching politics as a process corresponding to the stage of life to expand into society, is disrupted by an approach to political society motivated by material rewards to achieve the 'Step over power.
The involvement of the "old boys" from politics thus meet the general trend that I have described self-expansion of the personality, but they want power for power (characteristic of the 2 nd age). The strength of "old boys" of politics are the social networks that are armed with years of experience, more their knowledge. The knowledge and experience were what gave value to the 3 rd age. This is changing. With regard to knowledge, old age is no longer politically profitable at a time like the present where the knowledge does not accumulate in people but in the machines, and where change and innovation seduces society. They can always experience and this value is potentiated by the rapid changes in all spheres of life and the complexity of politics. The big boys of the 2 nd age have enough experience and political networks to take over politics.
It seems the trend is not the government of wise elders, whose vocation for the common good, completed its natural life cycle wrapped himself in politics naturally since the invention of democracy. Now, changes, and thus the fact that old age has been postponed (old no longer is 60 but at 70 years and over), and especially the fact that youth has become universalized as a political virtue makes youth is longer than before, and that the vocation of public affairs are relationships increasingly to power for power (characteristic of the 2 nd age) rather than a realization as a social characteristic of the 3 rd age. The bad, the downside is that the calls of nature to the completion of his personality turned over to the as a social common good (the elderly) have been virtually excluded from politics. The values \u200b\u200bof the world of politics have been disrupted. This also contributes to increased corruption. Contrary to what may be believed, the renewal of the policy would be increasingly difficult, the same faces are now more than ever a lot of things going for it to remain in the political establishment more years than their predecessors. And this despite the fact that society increasingly values \u200b\u200byouth and political renewal. More time on the management of public affairs bneficios moved by the materials available on the power increases the risk of greater corruption. And this

I wanted to get: the social bases of corruption. The person whose natural fulfillment was to meet with the common good as a social being (the elderly), the bearers of social ethics and excellence have been excluded from politics, leaving the political arena to fight of the 2 nd age ( the course of the 2 nd age, 30's-50's years with the "old boys of 60's-70's) struggle for the governance of society as a power play for power. The end result is a surge in corruption as social policy is passed, giving some support. Edson

Baldeón

All rights reserved. The ideas in this blog may be reproduced freely with only mention their authorship.

Herpes Zoster Avoid Food

THING! Caviars of Shit! Who are the caviar and what is their ideology?? An innocent question


Caviars shit!

Who are the caviar and what is their ideology?? Yesterday

facebook read by someone shot at another "caviar of shit!" Just because your partner reminded him that Fujimori was involved with large-scale corruption. This prompted my reflection on who the caviar and what his ideology.

Just type "caviar" in google to introduce the origins of the term "caviar" in France. It is not my intention to repeat that. What is rather mean to say in how to conceptualize this is now called an adjective.

adjetiviza generally as "caviar" liberals in Peru: supporters of FTAs, investment, human rights and the market. These critics of traditional political parties, but they are political opponents of the Fujimori and APRA leadership and less on the radical left. A Peruvian liberals gave them the nickname of "caviar" especially because their liberalism is associated with the defense of human rights as it really is common among liberals about the world. Major

Liberal del Peru ("accused" of caviar), we have to Javier Perez de Cuellar (former UN Secretary General), Valentin Paniagua (Ex President of Peru), Diego Garcia Sayan (current president of the IACHR) Susana Villaran (Former Minister), Rosa Maria Palacios (the most influential TV journalist), Augusto Alvarez Rodrich (the most influential print journalism), Francisco Soberon (APRODEH President and one of the top 50 human rights defenders in the world ), Beatriz Merino (1 st woman Premier democracy in Peru and current Ombudsman), César San Martín (Judge to sentence Fujimori, and the only member of the Peruvian judiciary included among the 100 most influential Latin American characters, 2009), Julio Cotler (the most prestigious social scientists in Peru), Gustavo Mohme million (missing journalist and owner of one of the most prestigious newspapers Peru, The Republic), Gustavo Gutierrez (Priest, intellectual liberation theology and the Prince of Asturias Prize), Luis Bambaren (Former President of the Peruvian Episcopal Conference, one of the most influential Catholics today), Marco Arana ( principal ecologist and the most recognized international environmentalists of Peru today), Fernando Rospigliosi (Ex Minister of Interior and designated as agent of the Department of State USA), Marcial Rubio Correa (President of the PUCP, the most prestigious University of Peru), etc. To be objective, the three priests mentioned (Gutierrez, Bambaren and Arana) would converge not necessarily in liberalism but have been further qualified as "caviar" because of its anti-corruption record in defense of democratic institutions and especially because they make common force liberals in their fight against Fujimori. Many

"accused" as caviar, not all belong to the same organization, or even agree on various points of view on the development of country or read the national socio-economic reality, but are united mainly by the defense of liberal democracy, the market as the primary allocator of resources in society, human rights and political liberalism. As well as its fight against corruption, the vices of traditional politics and political extremism. Its main enemies are the politicians Fujimori and his allies. Another feature of the so-called "Caviars is that they are usually men and women of state, who are not involved in corruption and experienced administrative and governance. They are the liberal elite of state. They are different from the leftists in both are liberal by conviction, openly defend representative democracy and markets, and are different from the neo-liberals argue about the effectiveness of the state to take better advantage of international market, human rights and fighting corruption. Not correspond with the nationalists whose leader (Ollanta Humala) seen as a demagogue and statist.

What alienates viscerally of Fujimori, his intellectual and moral authority. No "caviar" was involved in corruption or violation of human rights while almost nonexistent in the Fujimori (and among its allies, as the current leadership APRA) someone who is not involved in corruption and / or human rights violations.

is therefore neither politics nor economics especially distinguishes the caviar of Fujimori and allies but corruption and violations of human rights. From there comes the visceral hatred of Fujimori to callers caviar, because they know they are, and feel less morally and intellectually and that provokes a deep hatred because they too would like to have some attributes of the liberal state they call " caviar "with disdain. The Fujimori is deeply despised by liberals and leftists despise time. The leftists despise Fujimori, but envy the "caviar" and try to hide their inferiority complex to the Liberals (or caviar) with a mock contempt. Just give a read to the files to realize that the Fujimori rank among the most deceitful and cynical political history of Peru, but the hatred of Fujimori to the liberal (or caviar) is sincere, is perhaps the most sincere they have. The most lumpenesca while political action is that which has been led Fujimori to the Peruvian liberals (caviar).

The Fujimori and his allies can not appear before their constituents as morally and intellectually inferior to their rivals, the Liberals or caviar, and to feel morally and intellectually inferior you is very hard, so they can not lose battles without appearances before the public. And can not rise higher than liberals try to reduce them, at least to people, try to remove it from morality to the citizenry. They accuse them of "caviar" that is drawing up proposals against poverty while having a comfortable life style. But they do not really serious, but as an insult, exaggerating the alleged wealth of the "caviar" and distorting the meaning when they are not proposals of the Liberals. For example, today the Commission has raised the Peruvian State to cover the costs of trials without due process, but the dome APRA and have fujimontesinistas this as "compensation" for terrorists, and of course, as if the Liberals were not in favor of the rule of law, but being "generous" with terrorists, if not accusing them of pro-terrorist. They want to distort reality, to present white as black as black and white born from a deep inferiority complex moral and intellectual development of Fujimori and his allies felt against the Liberals. It would be good to get a newspaper to say the files of a newspaper like The Commerce during an election year and count how many times the Fujimori and his allies have said to defend the poor and how assets and income received and compare them with the Liberals. It would be unusual for Fujimori to win in two areas: they have more properties and also are sold more as advocates for the poor.

In fact, both liberals (caviar) and the Fujimori and allies are political elites. And none of these two sides are a united group and are part of a joint organization and do not necessarily have personal ties or between or within each side. And only share general views, and stuff.

What unites the "anticaviares" are not political, but dislike the Liberals (to callers with disdain "caviar"). This is the reason that its definition of caviar is not political, but in tone and made adjectival qualifier.

The difference between a liberal and a liberal agenda, the same as that between a "caviar" and Fujimori. All or almost all follow the same coordinates neoliberal policies that Fujimori general, while all or nearly all liberals Peruvians are related to so-called "caviar."

A liberal (or "caviar") will always be liberal in political terms, a supporter of liberal democracy, fundamental market as allocator of resources, and defense of human rights. That is very similar to U.S. liberal. In fact, in Peru as "caviar" in the United States are liberal. Instead, neoliberals are extremists in favor of absolute market and crush all of the rights of workers and the consecration of transnational capital unambiguously even above human rights. Fujimori is the most extreme expression.

The neoliberals are a tiny minority overvalued by their resources (most from the state who say fighting) that make them powerful media attention. Liberals (or caviar) are also a minority, although they may envision the germ of what would be the first liberal party of the country. The Fujimori would see its political decline after the 2011 elections, however, Liberalism in Peru struggle to start new political and electoral viability. Greetings



Edson Baldeón

All ideas in this blog may be reproduced freely only specify its authorship. All Rights Reserved

Brazilian Stomach Flu

Beatriz Ontaneda question "Why when a woman comes to light call it by its name, however if a man is called by his surname? Ejm: In a panel of electoral propaganda to tell Lourdes Flores Nano, Lourdes, and Maria Jesus Enrique candidate Ocrospoma tell: Ocrospoma ... "question is

serve to leave a little to enter politics and other topics. My dear Beatriz, some time ago I asked myself not being equal to the formulas you have any similarity. I wondered why some call them by name while others by their last name? As you can see not introduced the factor of gender and sex. But as I answered the question this way: People have a tendency to save what I can in different areas, but also follows certain criteria in order to save words, prefer what works best for a better identification, and thus prefers least common use of their 1 st or last names. Regarding the former, actually people tend to save words, for example to the Catholic University says "The cato" dad "pa", Catherine (my little neighbor) tells "tasting", etc. So many of the names are not complete but muhos say where the first two syllables, but only the first. Sofi (for Sophia), Al (by Alberto), Robert (Roberto), Giselle (by Gisela), Maga (by Magali), Fede (by Federico), etc., Etc.,

In the second case, the If you described, why sometimes used names or surnames, I answered this way: what it is to better identify the person and save time trying to distinguish one person from another. Should actually called "Alan Garcia, Lourdes Flores, Humberto Lay," Ollanta Humala "Susana Villar, Luis Castaneda, etc, but are usually called up by one of them for reasons of economy of language But why only some Scogan the only the name and other name?

Pongo examples to make it more graphic and understandable: Humberto Lay, Lay usually tell, because it is more common Humberto Lay. is that there are many Humbert and few Lays, one is more common than another. And so, as there are many Garcia'sy few Alan, at least when the President now became famous, then it is easier for the less common call either your name or surname. To identify others. Antero Antero Flores told more and less because there are many Florez Florez that anthers (better to call what we hear that what is read). The same goes for Lourdes Flores, is called "Lourdes" because that is always called and no need to change the name because it would be worth: Flores is just as common to Lourdes. As the two are commonly referred to by the two together: Lourdes Flores. " In the case of Lourdes Alcorta is called "Alcorta" or "Alcorta" it is not to be confused with "Alcorta Lourdes Flores as it is less common than" Lourdes. " In the case of Ollanta Humala, sucede que ambos no son tan comunes, al igual que sucede con Lourdes Flores se le dice “Ollanta” o “Humala”. Aquí sí puede funcionar un solo nombre porque ambos no son tan comunes (aunque ambos sean sustantivos propios). En el caso de Luis Castañeda, se le dice “Mister Comunicore”, jajajajj, nada, se le dice “Castañeda” porque es menos común que “Luis” y más aún que “Lucho”. Con Victor Andres García Belaunde se le llama por sus nombres y apellidos completos porque llamarlo “Víctor García” no tiene Cashe, es muy común, así que con llamarlo “Víctor Andrés García Belaunde” indistinguishable do, but because it is very long and economise is called simply "Vitocho."

question A timely response Ocrospoma call him because his name Enrique is more common. For them when they told the panel Lourdes Flores Lourdes "economized the call" Lourdes Flores "and when they called Enrique Ocrospoma only" Ocrospoma "also economized words because so named because they did not need to call him" Henry Ocrospoma "and only choose the least common, then your last name. They combined the two things, first the economy of language but this economy is using common least as common among their 1 st name and surname. Ever heard humble people who call Lourdes Flores 1, or its name or its 1 st surname but simply "Nano." I do. There you can clearly see the logic of people on the subject.

way one day I did a critique Sasieta Congresswoman Rosario, and when we met I said (in his style) "when referring to me but do not call me Sasieta Charo." Charo But what to call just because you ask me when it's easier to say "the congressman Sasieta" Imagine if you write an article "Congresswoman Charo said ..." No one would understand me! It will not then. One thing is that when you referred to someone in a face to face and quite another when it comes to identify that person publicly (in writing or by any means of communication). There is a logic when it comes to public men and women.

When you're in the family is often referred to by its name because it is illogical that the call Lourdes Flores "Flores" when everyone in the house are flowers. Just how I'm going to call my home Baldeón when several Baldeón. It will not then. When someone calls someone he wants to be responded, but how you will respond if not clearly distinguished. Also the name is always "loving" the name, because it is chosen especially for you. Instead, upon arrival at school, you "change" the name and call you by your name. The reason is because there is much less likely to have more unusual names than names. For example, it is likely that fewer Carlos Lopez, but especially because you change it officially in the records of attendance and all school records first and then put their names names. For example, many college friends did not know my name, they told me Baldeón, but at home I said "Ed" Edson. And I guess, Beatriz estimated that once you have called you "Bea", right?

When public figures postulate prefer to be called by their names rather than by their surnames, Lourdes Flores Lourdes prefer to be told, Luis Castaneda prefers even tell you "fight", and not even Luis, etc, but more Marketers as a form closer to the population. Have not seen the Kuchinsqui who prefers to be told "Pedro Pablo" or even PPK? The marketing also has a say in these matters.

For Keiko Fujimori Alberto Fujimori and the first case that we simply say Fujimori for economy of language, from "Albert" and "Fujimori" · choose only one: the less common, in this case "Fujimori" ('at least it was less common in 1990), while Keiko Keiko also just tell him also to economize words and Keiko Fujimori "choose only one but it happens not to choose "Fujimori" but "Keiko" to distinguish it from the father (who in turn popularized as the "Fujimori"). In the case of singers seems that marketing explains everything really Does anyone know how Madonna called or Shakira? Surely people would be interested, but I do more than their songs ... or hip ... Greetings

Edson Baldeón

Panasonic 3ccd Hardware Not Recognized

Steady END OF PERU AND THE VICTORY OF DEMOCRACY


Path Light has been brought back into the political arena as part of a bid to strengthen psychosocial Keiko Fujimori, to tell Julio Cotler. According to experts, including Deputy Minister of Internal Order and manager of the capture of Abimael Guzman, Marco Miyashiro, former Interior Minister Fernando Rospigliosi, the same Cotler, etc.

In my opinion, the Shining Path has been defeated in the military, political and ideological, and follow the same route followed by APRA mid-twentieth century and the leftists of the late nineteenth century: give up forever to revolution modify their conception of a just society. In fact, resigned from the force to take power, forcing it to define their concept of revolution, which in turn forces him to define his conception of a just society. VRAE what appears to be more drug trafficking groups in the service of certain political and not liquidated because it helps them keep up the budget for some leaders of the armed forces.

Shining Path seems to be the last remnant of the Enlightenment in Peru and the consequences of the French Revolution in America's political-military. It is said that the Enlightenment ideas of progress and modernity enter Peru via Argentina and Uruguay (anarchism) in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. The fact is that decades after the introduction of "enclaves economy" begins to take shape in Peru the formation of groups of workers. As Marxism was introduced in Peru were the first class organizations in the country. As in any institution based on ideas generated is always generated debate about the direction and future of these organizations. Haya de la Torre and José Carlos Mariategui then staged a debate that has consequences today.

Both agreed that socialism was a necessity for the country. What differed was the way to come to power to implement the Revolution and socialism in Peru. Mariategui postulated that the party had to form a Marxist revolutionary party led by working class, while the Toprre Hague believed that the working class at that time was very weak and demands a multi-class party, hence the popular alliance of workers intellectuals and left the helm of the organization to the middle class of which he personally was representative.

Shining Path is the continuation of those early Enlightenment who believed in socialism. Haya de la Torre finally breaks through and founded the APRA after discussion with Mariátegui, but assumes "pure Marxist" and postulated "historical time-space", which was actually their justification for not taking up arms and implement socialism. Haya de la Torre believed in the necessity of founding an organization equivalent to the Russian Communist Party, but adapted to the situation in Peru where the bourgeoisie was scarce. Thus the "historical spacetime Haya de la Torre is inextricably linked to how Haya de la Torre believed socialism could be implemented in Peru.

After this first core Enlightenment Peruvian Socialist split followed a series of divisions up to Sendero Luminoso. The first great division was the Haya and APRA. Then followed by others up to Red Flag, and then Sendero Luminoso. But all are born of the same common stock. APRA recently decided to enter the representative democracy in the 50-60 and never decisively. Only in the 80's when we can see that APRA was renouncing violence as a means of access to power, following the changes in the Soviet Union in the late 70's.

Around the same time we continue the Peruvian left bonded to the UI. The Peruvian left as APRA also realizes that it was difficult to revolution and socialism even after the Soviet disaster, and rotation of China.

Shining Path was the last vestige of socialist enlightenment in Peru: the first turn was given by APRA, after a long and instructive process waiving the revolutionary approach to socialism itself. Then in the 70 United left only renounced the Revolution, not socialism. The Peruvian left just in the process of renunciation of socialism, a process that should last several more years. Shining Path in 1993 resigned from the revolution, at least for the moment, not socialism. Left (IU) can happen just as the APRA and the left: his renunciation of revolution is the first step to a renunciation of socialism and its conception of a just society. Sendero Luminoso is a different case does not make sense for them a waiver to socialism, at least not while Abimael Guzman continued imprisonment. What we do can be expected to modify their conception of a just society, as did the APRA and as we currently are doing now left democratic-representative.

With the entry of Sendero Luminoso in representative democracy ends an era for Peru: the end of socialist enlightenment. For the first time we can say that we are on the verge of the Peruvian nation state and representative democracy, where all enemies have been defeated, not only in military terms but also in the ideological and political. One can not know what will happen in the future, but there are indications that once the influence of socialist enlightenment in Peru begins for our country the construction of its first state to the Peruvian nation, the strengthening of civil society and the beginning of modernity in the country full. Both

APRA, as the democratic left and as the Shining Path are born of a common core: the socialist enlightenment in Peru. At the end of this century ended. What is now "reborn" is advertising for Fujimori's candidacy. GONE WITH TERRORISM capitulation of Abimael GUZMÁN.Lo remains is to finish LIVING WITH TERRORISM. this is a task for the parties but especially civil society.

noise by a protest march walkers, the seizure of criminal subversive material in Santa Monica, etc. appear to be part of a psychosocial some stakeholders to raise Keiko Fujimori's candidacy, and therefore has no relevance in the progress of the nation. Neither comes from reviewing the seized USB assumptions Maritza Garrido Lecca: his approach to Ollanta Humala, the reactivation of walkers bases, their alliance (the SL) with the FARC and Patria Roja, talks with nationalist and leftist leaders like Father Arana, etc. We know all that can bring about USB in the hands of Montesinos that ultimately would serve as advisor to the APRA government.

The defeat of terrorism in Peru by the action of the Armed Forces and the Peruvian society should be continued with defeat OF LIVING OF TERRORISM. And that is a pending task of citizenship and civil society organizations. When we finish with the recent terrorist living we can say we have freed ourselves from terrorism and its allies. Urge a law that punishes both the advocacy of violence as those who assembled to raise psychosocial terrorism in the mass media to raise some cancidatura (as in this case is to favor Keiko Fujimori). Both ailments have similar consequences and the punishment should be the same. The state has every right to defend itself against its enemies.

Best Regards, Edson

Baldeón