The attitude of the successful candidate
As mentioned earlier, successful candidates as Humala Toledo 2000 or 2006 could be considered ancestors of Lay Sun in the sense that they share similar backgrounds: they had a first appearance that the national exalted himself elected but then disappeared from politics to come back with a profile out sider in an electoral scenario "busy."
Toledo appeared in the 1995 elections had a ceiling of 15% after low, to almost disappear. After the elections of 95 simply "disappeared." Reappeared in 2000 and was hailed as "new," in which his novel? It seems that because in his 1 st appearance was not related to a particular party. This, together with features people out sider (an internationally cholo successful) and stance catapulted him out sider in 2000 and never stopped until 2001.
Something similar happened with Humala, appeared in 2000 at the end of the Fujimori government. After Lucumba simply disappeared until 2006. In the elections of 2006, appeared several months with 1% (as Toledo in 2000 and Lay at this time), but quickly rose to 1 place, won the 1 st round and was within 3 points to win. The 1st time it appeared in 2000 was not associated with any particular party and when it appeared in 2006 did show signs out sider and a stand out sider face a mess of white "Alan Lourdes Vs. Like Toledo, 2000 (Fujimori Or Andrade vs. Castañeda) and Lay today (Kouri Vs Lourdes).
(With Lay something similar was happening, but lacks Lay Sun further sharpen its image out sider.
Well, combining the above argument with the experience of U.S. and Colombia see processes with some similarities. In the U.S. Barack Obama had a brilliant appearance in July 2004 at the Democratic Convention. This gave a national dimension but then "disappeared" as a senator until 2008 where he won the Democratic primaries and the presidency of his country after a spectacular campaign. A space "occupied" by Hillary Clinton and others, a profile out siders and the fact that he was not associated (as part of a prisoner from) a party, but rather as someone who was beyond his party, were other facts consistent with Humala Toledo 2000 and 2006.
In Colombia, something similar is happening. Antanas Mockus is having a dramatic breakthrough. In 2006 ran for President, was in 4 th place, but this fact gave a national dimension and associated with national political power. Siders out its position, its appearance in an apparently busy stage (between the U.S. and the Conservative Party), the fact of not being under the control of any party (recently joined the Green Party last year, 2009), are other similarities with Toledo 2000, 2006 and Obama Humala, 2008.
But there are other similarities and differences to which attention must be paid. I will focus on two: the educational attitude and the way public spaces occupied by the successful candidate when both were known as when they won the election. The media profile is almost a consequence of his candidacy.
If one studies the presentation of these applications may be mentioned that some candidates had a teaching attitude than others. The pedagogical approach, to explain things with the lowest possible cases to reach a basic level of general understanding of things, I intend to show relationships between problems and solutions is an attitude shared by some of these applications.
Perhaps this is what differentiates these applications from each other. There is no doubt that Obama did a great job teaching Mockus also, but not Toledo and less Humala. Perhaps this important element has contributed to the fact that Humala has not reached the few votes he needed to become President. Well, not having a teaching attitude was unable to reverse some trends from the accusations against him as his supposed intellectual incapacity to govern a complex country like Peru.
I'm sure if Humala had had a teaching attitude could have avoided such that a brash congressman accused him of "mediocre cop" to the delight of their opponents. The fact that between 1 ° and 2 ° turn has had a defensive attitude instead of a teacher I think it was fertile ground for the power groups through the mass media will win the battle. The edge is still open for Humala, if you want to overcome such nicknames has in the teaching attitude of a tool.
teacher's attitude about the candidate for the city, the fact that you heard about the causes of a problem on the defensive and focus on the problem but the solution produces an effect of approaching the city, not only by reasoning but attitude, reduce the role of the media through the media, especially among voters in the big cities. Focus on the imagery of people passing through a teaching attitude of a speech "statist" to a regulated market is perhaps lacks Humala for a winning stance in 2011. Occupy
center a little, approaching people through a teaching attitude seems to be a mark not only the out siders such as Obama's successful but in general, but let's look at Fernando Belaunde, Garcia Perez, Mockus. Instead Toledo also has a deficit on that side.
Another characteristic shared by these candidates success is its relationship to public space both when released and how they occupied the public space when they won or nearly won the election. On this again in my next article. Greetings
Baldeón Edson Gutierrez
@ All rights reserved
0 comments:
Post a Comment