Wednesday, June 16, 2010

Long Dong Silver, Free Movie

Political leadership promise and as farce: Why policy is anthropomorphic? On the out siders



Why politics is anthropomorphic? Is the question that tried to answer in this post. I tried to summarize the reasons for the policy anthropomorphism in 4 factors.

1 º Identification of the actions of political virtues (or vices) to the politician himself. Politics is deliberation, decision and action. The deliberate policy, decided and done and then discuss, decide and transmit values \u200b\u200bthat can be weighed by the membership of his party or the public. For example, a few weeks ago Congressman Víctor Andrés Popular Action Garcia Belaunde dismissed as "unworthy" to APRA for obstructing congressional election of members of the Constitutional Court. Congress President demanded the withdrawal of those words. García Belaunde not retired and reaffirmed it. A portion of the public supports the statement by the Popular Action congressman, and Rep. advances its claim to be the next President of the Congress. The actions of politicians convey values. What he does what he says is what the political citizens. If she does or says political transmits sincerity, opportunism and cynicism that's part of the subjectivity of the public.

The values \u200b\u200bof a good politician or a political ideal is part of the political culture of the company concerned, and are perceived in the actions and decisions of politicians. If a politician does things that are perceived as intelligent, courageous or honest politician then be associated with these virtues, and we have a politician perceived as intelligent, fearless and honest. This is one of the factors in the anthropomorphizing of politics: the identification of the actions of political virtues (or vices) to the politician himself.

2 The policy and seeking the common good. The second factor to the anthropomorphizing of the policy would to do with politics as a way to strive for the common good. The government is related to the search for the common good of society and to achieve the common good requires that politicians are related to the values \u200b\u200bthat enable good governance: the courage, intelligence, honesty, frugality, work, the gift of command, the charisma, simplicity, where the word, courage, gallantry, etc.. These values \u200b\u200bare perceived as positive because they make possible the preservation of life, of freedom, equity, justice.

implicit rationing is as follows: a righteous person will make things fair, a make things honest man honest, intelligent woman will do things intelligent. And all these virtues are good for good governance. 3 º

political leadership in a context of uncertainty. Political leadership means ability of a person to be custodian of the political confidence of a sector of the population. Its net indicator is their intention to vote for the highest office in their jurisdiction.

happens in countries such as Peru's political candidates for public office through games. Are the parties who nominate candidates. Politicians alone can not run if it is presented and endorsed by a party.

But the complexity of the situations that have generated a constant uncertainty and we need many decisions that can not be agreed by the parties of the politicians. Are the politicians themselves who have to decide once in government, not parties. This makes it necessary that the political virtues which ensure that good governance including the need that is not hamstrung by a bureaucratic entity and parties. 4 º Leadership

promise and leadership as a farce. Leadership is always a promise. A future promise of incentives on those who support them. And a promise is always referred to the future. So a leader must have personal qualities that make it credible that implicitly promises. All who join a leader expect the realization of that promise and that promise is better if it can be expressed publicly highlighted, developed with input from many, and there is a context and resources (all types) sufficient to realize such promise.

A real leadership expands their personal goals and goal-partisan national goals even when the personal project needs to be confused with the party and the country, synergistically. A scale that can attract people that are committed to that leadership. And those people are the strength that you need that leadership to the activities of the construction of a project. Intelligence, wisdom, strength, virility, courage, charisma, expression ... and a gift of himself favored by God, enable strong leadership. All leadership, however, development is always a promise and a farce. A promise and a farce combined cleverly strung together as a watermark in a specific context in which it feeds.
Leadership is a farce as long as the person standing in a particular context by force is influenced by a number of reasons, motives, circumstances, and these are always conflicting in a complex society like the present. And yet, the politician is obliged to keep a sufficient policy coherence to ensure their actions in government. But it happens that social contradictions are also expressed in personal contradictions, opinion, political position. And except for some great ideas politician has enough space to accommodate the views of the people either as a candidate either as a government. In fact a person with fixed or fully coherent ideas is a myth. When someone says "I say what I think" not telling the truth, because what you think not only always be much more than what you say but will not always be consistent about thoughts on others. In reality, the complexity of social life is reflected in contradictions almost all debatable issues. Except for some dogmas, everything else has room for heterodoxy, the staging and the use language. A person who "says what he thinks is a myth.
And yet the politician has to be consistent, something very, very difficult and not much memory do you need to find political contradictions in the most virtuous of national policy. Between before and now. Not only honesty but a good memory and intelligence can aquiline, with effort, make it appear as a coherent policy. That is why political leadership will always be a promise as both a farce. Greetings

Edson Baldeón
@ All rights reserved

0 comments:

Post a Comment