What have you got to see the Viagra to political renewal? Well, a lot. And in this article try to explain this relationship. We can divide the life of the person into three parts. The first age, childhood and adolescence and early adulthood, would correspond to an incomplete personality: between physiology and their potential there is a gap. The child is selfish, insecure, the entire world revolves around him. The young man is concentrating on his body. In the second age, the physiological approaches its potential, the contented man in his own body, leaving your body and look for another: the woman, and together they make one. Everything that exists exists in the couple together as a whole. The forces of nature living in couples. It is the stage of realization with the formation of family and emotional stability. The elderly, old age, now longer than ever by the advances in medicine and increased standard of living, is when a man does, not in their own humanity (1 º age) and family (2 º age ), but community in society. In the 3 rd age man performs as a social being, turns its gaze to the community. Obviously these three ages of man are arbitrary, as they are mediated by all the vices of modern society and anomie as ours, but I serve as a general trend. I see it as three stages of human life but not so much psychological time (which could not be detached from the physiological).
then observe a general tendency of men to its expansion, from the inside out. First, solve the problem of his own body, then the body of others (his wife, children), and ends trying to work out as a social being in the "body" social (people who do not necessarily know). This seems to be the natural order of things. Like if you put the seed of life at one point and this point grows out of his body, and seeks to dissolve in around him, the social context. But what happens when this order is modified by the introduction of natural elements such as Viagra and the effects of new technologies, advances in medicine, etc..??
Now, if it is a general trend that people only in their 3 rd age to aim at the social it is also true that many people are oriented to the social in his youth. I myself have participated in politics since my teens. However, when young are inserted into the parties continue to accord priority your body and the body of others (your partner) rather than the policy itself (which is referred to persons not known, the imagined community, the common good, general interest , etc.), unless it thundered or upload any psychological malformation. I have lived in communities (parties) so I know not so much science. The natural tendency is for the youth policy is always an afterthought, or at least the middle of your daily interest is not politics. In the 3 rd age, however, is a natural tendency for the social. It seems that proximity to death forces the person to look as far as possible. Therefore tends his eyes to the social, and therefore politics.
Technology is changing this natural tendency, the dramatic increase in life expectancy, the remarkable increase in living standards, reducing the time and space by the introduction of technology in daily life has the effect of changing the natural tendency I have mentioned. What have you got to see then the Viagra to political renewal? I explain this: the youth is related to innovation, and this in the resolution, strength, determination, independence. And these are virtues in politics. The company looks good when young people displace old politicians.
But not only young people are thrown into power with speeches in support of the community, but also the old attempt to "rejuvenate." In fact, in Peru today are increasingly politicians who dye their hair, they enter the operating room to get some "deal worked out" and are regulars at the gym, and some even as a friend told me of the aging last week (which was the reason for writing this article) ingest resveratrol, the latter to take years "inside." Everything goes away from the mind of decrepitude, old age, death.
By focusing on the life world of the "old boys" 50 to 70 years away the prospect of death in their lives, and therefore what should be the natural tendency of approaching politics as a process corresponding to the stage of life to expand into society, is disrupted by an approach to political society motivated by material rewards to achieve the 'Step over power.
The involvement of the "old boys" from politics thus meet the general trend that I have described self-expansion of the personality, but they want power for power (characteristic of the 2 nd age). The strength of "old boys" of politics are the social networks that are armed with years of experience, more their knowledge. The knowledge and experience were what gave value to the 3 rd age. This is changing. With regard to knowledge, old age is no longer politically profitable at a time like the present where the knowledge does not accumulate in people but in the machines, and where change and innovation seduces society. They can always experience and this value is potentiated by the rapid changes in all spheres of life and the complexity of politics. The big boys of the 2 nd age have enough experience and political networks to take over politics.
It seems the trend is not the government of wise elders, whose vocation for the common good, completed its natural life cycle wrapped himself in politics naturally since the invention of democracy. Now, changes, and thus the fact that old age has been postponed (old no longer is 60 but at 70 years and over), and especially the fact that youth has become universalized as a political virtue makes youth is longer than before, and that the vocation of public affairs are relationships increasingly to power for power (characteristic of the 2 nd age) rather than a realization as a social characteristic of the 3 rd age. The bad, the downside is that the calls of nature to the completion of his personality turned over to the as a social common good (the elderly) have been virtually excluded from politics. The values \u200b\u200bof the world of politics have been disrupted. This also contributes to increased corruption. Contrary to what may be believed, the renewal of the policy would be increasingly difficult, the same faces are now more than ever a lot of things going for it to remain in the political establishment more years than their predecessors. And this despite the fact that society increasingly values \u200b\u200byouth and political renewal. More time on the management of public affairs bneficios moved by the materials available on the power increases the risk of greater corruption. And this
I wanted to get: the social bases of corruption. The person whose natural fulfillment was to meet with the common good as a social being (the elderly), the bearers of social ethics and excellence have been excluded from politics, leaving the political arena to fight of the 2 nd age ( the course of the 2 nd age, 30's-50's years with the "old boys of 60's-70's) struggle for the governance of society as a power play for power. The end result is a surge in corruption as social policy is passed, giving some support. Edson
Baldeón
All rights reserved. The ideas in this blog may be reproduced freely with only mention their authorship.
0 comments:
Post a Comment