Comments surveys after the "potoaudios"
was watching the polls and support PUCP, in my opinion the most prestigious of Peru. Both agree almost perfectly in terms of primer and in terms of Decree. Both give advantage to Susan in primer 43 • IOP-PUCP and 42% Ipsos Apoyo, while Lourdes both give 28% in PBS and 26% card. In both polls Lourdes Susan wins in level A, while Susan beats Lourdes in all other socio-economic levels, with level in D / E is a huge difference for Susan. The antivoto against Lourdes has risen to 50% while for Susana Lourdes has dropped to 31% (IOP-PUCP). Susan wins in both women and men and in all ages, registering a staggering 50% to 29% among youth. Voting security is also favorable for Susana 38% to 25%. Finally, 56% believe that Susan will win, and only 30% believe that Lourdes.
What does this mean? The trends that have continued to come back, and probably (only probably) have accelerated or enhanced (this seems more likely) with the spread of the now popular "potoaudios." It also means that there are reasons (security of the vote, the antivoto, trends, etc.) to say it is very likely to continue rising and Lourdes Susana continue to decline. None of the figures moved to think otherwise. How will
Lourdes reacted against these latest results of the most prestigious polls? We leave to the imagination of Carlin.
The perception that Lourdes is the candidate of the rich may be reinforced by two facts that are emerging: First, the objective fact that the electoral niche of Lourdes is only Level A (which she called "fools" in the famous audio) and second, to the propaganda on TV. The more propaganda goal more the perception of "candidate of the rich."
was announced massive propaganda to FREDEMO TV. Not sure what finally reach out, but I hope we reach out. I am convinced that this will not alter the final result, but would have an effect (not desired by its promoters) would return eventually take out useless in 2011. I hope also that Susan does not take a single spot on TV. Why? Not required. Do not think because there is a difference of 10 points between the card and card means that this has to be saved by television broadcasting. No. Susana and their advisers need to understand that this dispute will compose naturally. First, the people tied to the candidate (Susan) and then later asks for the symbol). This has been happening. Last week, it marked not the FS was about 5%, now this percentage has risen to 10% that would be mostly new adherents of Susana. I do not think the election day the difference between the votes by ballot card and the difference gets less than 1%, insignificant against the probable difference of valid votes in his favor. Best to save that money and keep it for his party's campaign in 2011 que más falta le va a hacer. Además, si Susana no teme un centavo en TV dará un ejemplo democrático al resaltar la decisión de los ciudadanos que la intervención de los poderes fácticos. Y sentará un precedente para el 2011.
Para ganar, lo único que tiene que hacer Susana es lo mismo que ha venido haciendo hasta hoy: seguir caminando hasta el último día, una intervención de propuestas en el debate con Lourdes y ver el tema de los personeros (aquí serán claves sus aliados). O SEA UNA CAMPAÑA AUSTERA Y DECENTE. Nada más tendría que hacer para asegurar su victoria el 3 de octubre.
¿De qué forma Lourdes podría ganar? En mi opinión de ninguna forma. Lo I could do would be to lose with dignity, honor: Bayly attending the program, one on one refuting allegations that are made, not by attacking his opponent, be more natural to show their proposals especially during Sunday's debate. The advice of Lourdes is to lose with dignity in defense of democracy and the good of the city. Greetings
Edson Baldeón
0 comments:
Post a Comment